This1s Pok$r

I think there is not a clear answer like, you should not cc because you will lose x bb/100 compared if you had 3b.

But I give some reasons why I never cc. I hate playing a capped range and if you 3b all of your range you will make your life much more easy. I hate MW pots, they are hard to play and study. I hate being squezzed, in passive games people may not squeezing much so your cc EV goes up but once you will move up the stakes you will face much more aggressive players. I really like to simplify the things as much as possible because there are literally tons of more important spots to study. Get solid fundamentals, postflop strategys and then maybe learn things like limp SB range and cc range.

Also your sample is very small and while you have a decent winrate you don't know what your winrate would be if you 3b that hands.

I pot flop.

I pot flop. As played I think you can go for a smaller river bet to target his 99-

As for the bluffs they may cut, ofc this is the case if they play 3b or fold as more do.

Yeah generally micros 3bets are known to be value havue.

Sorry for not mentioning. 100 bb effective. Villain opens 3bb hero 3b to 12bb.

Take note and adjust accordingly, be careful though he can adjust too.

OP I had the exact same thoughts with you, thank you for posting this and thank the rest of the posters for this good material.

Can some1 reply how much is a good raise if we have a flush blocker on our hand?

Fold pre. By calling without a good read-reason you are making a small mistake that leads you to even bigger mistakes postflop.

I think the best way is just practice. But before make sure you understand a move in a good degree. Solvers may help here to show you what combo and when you should XR but don't forget you can't just copy a solver or snowie, you should somehow understand when to deviate from optimum play, hud stats can help here. If villain is station size up your XR and raise only value hands etc. And last don't get frustrated if something is not working in a vacuum, variance is a thing and goes with poker hand by hand.

Well I am playing at 20NL atm and pool just seems to be very passive and regs generally seem to be very imbalanced in certain spots and don't adjust when you get out of line.

I strongly bealive that this idea of getting exploited is more a psichological fear than a real fact. At least at lower limits.

By saying 3 barreling I meant value betting 3 streets not bluffing obviously the station.

That is a good point. It is hard to describe in words, generally I would say after long sessions I start to tilt if I am card dead and making plays based on emotion. Some small mistakes.

What do you mean others to fight back. I never understand that. From what I see, when there is a fish table, everyone is just playing their normal game, just little bit looser.

Versus an aggressive reg I definitely call this, he could value bet any worst Q.

Fold pre at pokerbros.

When I told my mother that I have new hobby that 1 day can turn into my main income the first thing she did was searching on the net and reading some horse shit claiming online poker is rigged. Ofc she bealived it and no matter what I say I can not change her mind. Even the fact that I turned 5 euro to 700 in 2 months.

Come to Nebet I take you for a walk to the town.
Sorry for being rude but any1 claiming online poker, nowadays on the biggest site is rigged is an idiot. Accept that you suck and improve your game or stop playing. Everything else is just excuses.....

Pokersnowie ranges.

I expect a reg to raise lot of bluffs on this board which seems much better for him also turn and river improved his flop calling range and he should have more 3s and 4s than you.

I check this flop and fold river without read.

I base my statement on my experience. Guy seems way to passive. These guys afraid to risk a lot of bb with weak hands, this is the reason they have so small rfi and 3b pre stats. They also afraid to bluff, this is the reason you should overfold versus these guys. Not only this but this is also a 3b pot, that means they have to risk even more bb. I doubt he has ATs in his range. Or should I say that he will never have enough bluffs in his range to make your turn call +EV.

I think you exploitevly fold pre.
AP fold turn. I expect close to zero semi bluffs in his range.

Tir-x May I express my disagreement about using solvers at low stakes? First of all I want to say that I have never used a solver by myself but I have been reading a lot of hand reviews on 2 plus 2 that involve some output from a solver for the last 6 months.

My homble opinion is the most difficult part using a solver is to know when and how you should deviate from a theory right play. Also node locking can provide us better output when we get some idea of how villain plays/constract his range. This missaplication of solver is when mistakes are made.

Also exploitative strategy goes hand in hand with gto. How can you exploit properly if you don't know how someone is deviating from theory?

There is also a misconception that someone who is using solver is trying to copy every frenguency /move exactly which obviously is stupid and not true against low stakes players at least.

My last point is there are some really tough spots sometimes that you literally can not figure up what is the best play even out of the table. And I doubt you will find a decent advice online without a solver output. In that case solver comes to give as light and show us the right way, it is up you to follow or not thought.

6% open = hero folds ATo and waits a good hand to stack the fish.

x/c x/c donk = hero folds, saves some bb and waits a good hand to stack the fish.

Hero calls = hero gets stacked by the fish.

I open some low SC from late position and 3b some as snowie suggests.

There is a video which talks about SC and basically saying that SC has not implied odds bc you lose to better flush so you are never comfortable playing for big pot when you hit your flush. The video also saying that SC has great bluff potential bc it connects with so many ways to the flop and they should be played IP.

SC are also great for board coverage for your 3b range otherwise your range becomes too transparent and obviously you can stack big overpairs when you hit your 2 pairs or trips bc not too many players will expect you to 3b with 56 for example.

There is an argument that 45s 56s 67s are better than 78s 89s bc the latter has some riverse implied odds and it doesn't really make a big difference if you have a pair of 5 or 8 in 3b pot.

There is also an argument that SC are better 3b candidates than a hand like KQ AJ for example bc the latter can be dominated in 3b pot.

I disagree with you saying that everyone is playing around SC. You may be unlucky and don't get enough value out of them. My "small" experience in my games says the opposite.

I know you want to punish the fish, but don't make plays based on emotion. Just fold, be patient, get a hand and destroy him.