Memo999

I dont really understand your reasoning. Im pretty sure, he can balance it with bluffs. It seems like a good sizing, since he can have all the nut comboes (AA, AQ and QQ) and villains cant.

I defend around around 22% vs MP (either 3B or Call)

But what value hands do you play this way?
If villain starts folding AT, then he can fold everything ott (unless he starts raising turn with trips/2p, which I doubt).

Fancy play imo.

Youre leading into a polarized range, very bad.

Did you correct for the 100bb/100 loss?

Worse Axs, villain is calling pre with loads of Axs himself, so seems
like bad business starting to bluffcatch with the nutty part of our range. Especially when we block his bluffs a bit with Jx.

Easy bet for otf, we got "nuts" and it sucks to check w J in our hand.

The ones claiming its nonsens, how much do you charge? Or actually try to russian ptr the rio midstakes coaches (zoom500 guys), enough said.

Well, the ones coaching/making videoes usually doing it cause they cant beat the game anymore.

The ones coaching are usually the ones, you dont want to coach you. As well as the ones making videoes (havnt seen yours SIH, so nothing personal) with few exceptions like Sauce, OMGClayAiken. Usually people are coaching for a reason :)

Im not really sure, what youre trying to say? I think QQ is earning me money betting.

I think QQ is a fine vb, hey.

So you want people to help you for free with your game in your posts, but you dont wanna spend the time making a decent OP? I dont like that approach and yes color codes and pot sizes saves all the readers (and potential helpers) a lot of time.

Oh and hey the time spended making this post, was prolly equal to reading 50 bad OPs :D

I understand you and totally agree, if that was my approach, but I like to look at my own range and make deccisions from that (not that I dont wanna exploit pool tendencies).

@UpUpAndAway

Why can villians play perfectly against you? If true, you either constructed your ranges bad and/or playing gto bots :)

Ps. Is it too much to ask for, that a mod makes a decent OP (colour codes etc.)?

I agree, but 64s is good enough to defend, if we play postflop well (not start to raise randomly like OP).

I dont see how I could ever check this river behind, given how many bluffs I bet.

I just fold against a nit, I got plenty of better hands to call.

You cant avoid tough decissions (oop/ip) in poker. Call his raise and dont 3bet the flop, if you dont have an exploitive strategy against him.

Now fold and realize you played the hand bad :)

Sample size? :)

Bet/fold river seems good, if he is a passive fish.

@Jedi/Sado. I dont see a reason to jam here? Is villain often calling with worse? I like a check and then bet river along with bluffs

Of the vbs in a perfectly polarized range.

"Having blocker doesn't weigh our decision here"

Why not, he is having 2 less 55 comboes with us holding 5x.

"Obv you'll be bluffed a fair bit, but als value-towned way too often"

What do you mean with way too often? Are you talking about an inbalanced villain?

It depends. What bluffs do you got otf? Or actually how wide is your range?

@MrSneeze.

I know you advocate for intuition a lot on these forums, but to me its way overrated, when comparing to just play a balanced strategy.

Too thin to 4b call imo.

Flop seems uber std. Agree with turn.

Why? Seems like a bad response, since we aren't letting him realizing his bluffs.

I doubt I would use this combo as a XR-buff otf. Think it got too little bd equity.

Btw. NL100 is NOT midstake, so could you please post the hands in the low stakes section? :) http://www.runitonce.com/nlhe/low/

No you shouldnt, 6 tables is excellent for playing live, since there will be a lot of things to talk about then. Great work, please keep 6-tabling in the videoes.