vkartmann

i prefer using one bet size (66%), i find more balance applying my range to my betsize rather then doing pure guesswork. EV differences between [x betsize] compared to [xyz betsize] is on average very small. (ofc some exceptions)
if u want to optimize study time i have two ideas: 1. sort in excel for equity realization in aggregated reports: look at the solutions and write down how pio changes strats giving eq/ev. 2. look at range explorer and write down hand strenghts of both players and what pio is doing as a results, what patterns can u identify?

you are a dog on this flop, still betting 55 and 66 for protection at some freq is fine. if an ace hits you have a decent bluffing hand. i expect IP to almost never fold to your cbet, so we need a solid plan for the turn. if u cbet 55 with spades, u also have to continue to a raise or get exploited. i think it is easier to check 100% here and not mess with over-complicated strategies.

rio is a coaching site not entertainment for kids

bring teunuss back pls :(

he also did this amazing laydown https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GR0n6x9VeMA

Gl to You Sir! ;)

im folding pre; reasoning: 1. rake 2. range disadvantage 3. bb squeeze 4. EV calling < EV folding because folding makes your more $/hour