Robert Van Scoyoc

its good bc regs dont like making big calls deep. its rush so ppl make tighter folds too bc of the RUSH factor

I think its good if hes 3 betting with bluffs OOP and he can have some air. I definetly think people are going to be barreling this board texture with higher frequencies than most but there are good run outs that lend themselves to you just winning bc your are IP.

I think preflop is close but fine just because i generally hate flatting OOP so i tend to 3 bet this but thats very opponent dependent. Vs regs i just call. These spots vs regs we are usually just swapping money back and forth and i dont think they will make too many mistakes in these situations. on the turn i think leading or c/c is fine i tend to like leading to protect our equity vs hand with outs, but it seems like when he checks its not to just fold the turn .

I think its pretty bad because i think he will play very well vs this and it makes it hard for him to make mistakes against us. Essentially you are assuming he is so wide here cant stand a bet call but i think bad villians at these stakes will bet call almost any pair and in turn play near perfect vs your hand. So esentially you are just protecting your hand vs his worse holdings. But i think we are risking to much to do that. Better routes would be c/c or just keep betting you get the benefit of protectiong you hand and you risk 1.1-1.4 ro so not a whole BI for these stakes.

Call bc people lead rivers here with their whole range that c/c flop floats worse pps etc etc....but he's polarized on the river and I tend to weight it towards bluffs. If he is c/c flop with Ax to bluff catch its unlikely he leads the river for value. That would not follow congruent lines of logic. I realize this isn't always true but I tend to find the river lead here is the weaker parts of his range and when he checks he always has Ax. I just don't think people like to kill the value of bluff catching hands and bet bug on the river. So i call or raise if I think he will fold AT also:)