stars vs partypoker rakeback
Posted by locke547
Posted by
locke547
posted in
Low Stakes
stars vs partypoker rakeback
hey guys
im an MTT player lookin to improve his game by playing more cash...dont want to donate so starting lowstakes...played 25K hands fastforward with 15BB/100 but recently been folding topset vs nitregs flopraise due to the lack of timebank at fastworward tables while trying to figure out the raisesize...which obv is annoying
also there is a lack of action sometimes at partypoker...so when i wanna play i gotta switch to zoom
good friends told me to go to fastforward at lowstakes cause the rake is lower...i found out that i prefer zoom cause of timebank/bigger(softer??) playerpool/better gameplay
now i tried to search online for exact rake conditions of zoom on stars but didnt find anything...this is where im lookin for input and help
how much higher is the rake at zoom ??
how much of that cost is covered by the higher rakeback at stars ??
is it reasonable to think my winrate might makeup for the higher rake in this bigger(softer??) pool
thx for the help guys
Loading 6 Comments...
Sounds like if your goal is to improve you should seek out the toughest games relative to the stakes, regardless of the rake/rakeback. Just my 2 cents
well its not like i wanna donate either
im lost way too often already :(
my approach is to grind up a seperate BR aswell...so its not like im only playing to learn
bump
Party is wayyyy softer than zoom (except for now as summer of grind promo is going on). Timebank is annoying as F though
it is...i also realized i should be able to play 4zoom tables which is double my fastforward tables...only cause of the better gameplay setup at pokerstars
Be the first to add a comment