site choice for nl50 and nl100

Posted by

Posted by posted in Low Stakes

site choice for nl50 and nl100

Where do you guys play?

Is nl50, nl100 softer on euro sites like BetVictor (prima) or iPoker than on PokerStars? 

I know they also offer good deals like 40% rakeback but their rake is bigger ... so i'm not sure the deals are better that Pokerstars' Supernova.

I played quite a bit on Winamax (France) and the games were softer that on PS but rake was about 2 times bigger and i didn't do as good in those games. (also rakeback sucked, something like 10%)


5 Comments

Loading 5 Comments...

Bronson 10 years, 5 months ago

bump ... 

did i post it in the wrong section ? i felt like the Low Stakes NL holdem was the most appropriate

also did some search and couldn't find much info on this subject  

SPrince 10 years, 5 months ago

You don`t play fast formats Bron ?

Zoom/Rush 50-100NL is pretty soft.

Bronson 10 years, 5 months ago

nope, i play regular tables ... 

the field on stars is pretty good, but i have played on 888 and winamax and those were better but rake was 2 times bigger

was curious how are Prima and iPoker these days ... getting 50% rakeback is pretty tempting


Rob 10 years, 5 months ago

I spent about a year playing 100nl on ipoker and yeah, the rakeback is great. The massive downsides are though that the software is awful compared to Stars or Full Tilt. In the year that I played there I lost at least five buy ins because of being disconnected and the money being missing from my account when logging back in, support were of course uncooperative. 


If you put in enough volume on Stars the VIP scheme isn't so bad. Like you mentioned already too, the rake is a lot lower on Stars than the other sites anyway. 

Be the first to add a comment

Runitonce.com uses cookies to give you the best experience. Learn more about our Cookie Policy