NL50 Zoom: standard spot CO vs BB, do I need to cbet? (EV analysis)
Posted by Slava Brat
Posted by Slava Brat posted in Low Stakes
NL50 Zoom: standard spot CO vs BB, do I need to cbet? (EV analysis)
SB: $52.00
BB: $50.00
UTG: $113.27
MP: $50.00
CO: $61.49 (Hero)
Pocket pairs: 22-99
Offsuited combos: ATo-AJo, KTo-KQo, QT-QJo, JTo
Suited combos: A6s-ATs, K7s-KTs, Q9s-Qts, J9s-JTs, T8s-98s, 98s.
Since his 3betting range is wide enough, I think most low connectors, and suited aces and kings will end up being 3betted so I dont include them here.
After reviewing this hand, I made a simple CREV simulation to better understand my EV here. So, assuming that my opponent calls or raises this: ( >=middle pair, flushdraw, gutshots or more, Ahigh + bdfd) and folds everything else (1 over trash, 2 overs trash including AJ without bdfd, and pockets under 7), he calls 57% of hands and folds 43% of hands.
Real opponent had 49% fold to flop cbet OOP, so I think number of 43% is fair.
This way, my immediate EV of betting is 0.27, and by immediate EV I mean that to simplify my simulation I fold every turn. So even without outs to A, its good to bet here.
There are 2 problems with my analysis:
1) If opponent calls flops slightly more than 57% of time, for example he calls all pocket pairs, my bet turns out to be -EV, not including later streets.
2) Even if my EV of betting is better than 0, it might not be better than EV of checking, because by checking I generate some equity on my outs (Aces and sometimes Deuces) and have small SDvalue against Khigh and Qhigh.
What is you line here with weak Aces?
Loading 2 Comments...
Be the first to add a comment
You must upgrade your account to leave a comment.
This thread has been locked. No further comments can be added.