NL50 Defend vs ISO 3bet & bluffing vs delayed, terrible?
Posted by Skipper
Posted by
Skipper
posted in
Low Stakes
NL50 Defend vs ISO 3bet & bluffing vs delayed, terrible?
Blinds: $0.25/$0.50 (9 Players)
BN: $54.78
SB: $60.65
BB: $54.31
UTG: $50.00
UTG+1: $98.46
MP: $77.81
MP+1: $36.32
MP+2: $50.75
CO: $50.00 (Hero)
SB: $60.65
BB: $54.31
UTG: $50.00
UTG+1: $98.46
MP: $77.81
MP+1: $36.32
MP+2: $50.75
CO: $50.00 (Hero)
FISH 39/4 which Hero isolates. Villain - seems ABC breakeven REG. 18/12 after 40k+ hands. CBet 3BP ip 61/35(23). 3Bet vs ISO 4,4% on BTN.
Preflop
($0.75)
Hero is CO with
J
J
, , , , , , ,
Flop
($13.25)
9
4
Q
,
I though flop was like give up. Because of his most bluffs hit pretty hard (KQ, AQ).
Turn
($13.25)
9
4
Q
K
, , ,
On turn I put him on AK or (KJs, KTs semi-bluffs) and I though I can rep QQ's, 99, maybe 30% of time JTs,
River
($49.25)
9
4
Q
K
9
,
River shoving to get fold from AK.
Final Pot
BN
wins and shows a full house, Queens full of Nines.
CO lost and shows two pair, Jacks and Nines.
BN wins $98.75
Rake is $2.50
CO lost and shows two pair, Jacks and Nines.
BN wins $98.75
Rake is $2.50
I'm thinking that villain will have more bluffs preflop than strong hands (maybe he would 3bet AKo vs ISO from stronger range side), but all overpair I think he should flat, because of FISH and he is IP. So when he checks-back flop I put him on weak holding or AK. After some deep thinking my representing range too narrow and I should give up. Anybody see sence to bluff here?
Loading 3 Comments...
Be the first to add a comment
You must upgrade your account to leave a comment.
This thread has been locked. No further comments can be added.