NL50 Defend vs ISO 3bet & bluffing vs delayed, terrible?

Posted by

Posted by posted in Low Stakes

NL50 Defend vs ISO 3bet & bluffing vs delayed, terrible?

Blinds: $0.25/$0.50 (9 Players) BN: $54.78
SB: $60.65
BB: $54.31
UTG: $50.00
UTG+1: $98.46
MP: $77.81
MP+1: $36.32
MP+2: $50.75
CO: $50.00 (Hero)
FISH 39/4 which Hero isolates. Villain - seems ABC breakeven REG. 18/12 after 40k+ hands. CBet 3BP ip 61/35(23). 3Bet vs ISO 4,4% on BTN.
Preflop ($0.75) Hero is CO with J J
2 folds, MP calls $0.50, 2 folds, Hero raises to $2.00, BN raises to $6.00, 2 folds, MP folds, Hero calls $4.00
Flop ($13.25) 9 4 Q
Hero checks, BN checks
I though flop was like give up. Because of his most bluffs hit pretty hard (KQ, AQ).
Turn ($13.25) 9 4 Q K
Hero checks, BN bets $8.43, Hero raises to $18.00, BN calls $9.57
On turn I put him on AK or (KJs, KTs semi-bluffs) and I though I can rep QQ's, 99, maybe 30% of time JTs,
River ($49.25) 9 4 Q K 9
Hero bets $26.00 and is all in, BN calls $26.00
River shoving to get fold from AK.
Final Pot BN wins and shows a full house, Queens full of Nines.
CO lost and shows two pair, Jacks and Nines.
BN wins $98.75
Rake is $2.50

I'm thinking that villain will have more bluffs preflop than strong hands (maybe he would 3bet AKo vs ISO from stronger range side), but all overpair I think he should flat, because of FISH and he is IP. So when he checks-back flop I put him on weak holding or AK. After some deep thinking my representing range too narrow and I should give up. Anybody see sence to bluff here?

Loading 3 Comments...

Be the first to add a comment

You must upgrade your account to leave a comment.

This thread has been locked. No further comments can be added.

Runitonce.com uses cookies to give you the best experience. Learn more about our Cookie Policy