zooroaster

If this is a XC though, won't villain have to be bluffing a fair amount of miss str draws etc? I say that since if we assume AK would 4b most of the time then there aren't too many Kx that want to or will bet instead of a XB.  Is a river X (if that's the way we play this) always a XC?

RE: min ~26:00-talking about adding the middle SC's the deeper you get...can you expand on the importance of board coverage when deep?

Min 38-- BVB---ATo  Do you have much of a 4b/f range vs BB ever here or do you have to know w/ good certainty that villain will 3b trashy non linear type hands?

Min 37ish--defend J9s...is this type of hand ever in your XC range? you just think he never will stab again weaker than your holding?

21:30-AKs...was your plan to backraise since you had a read on a player on your left or did you decide not to 3b since EP RFI is 11%?  I guess your just gonna have a flat range vs this tight an open?

I think I agree w hand one---what exactly are you trying to accomplish?  I think we come off like we are trying to steal the pot but are probably still in the middle of our range vs what he will call with.  

Personally I am X'ing on at least one street.  The flop/turn misses our range pretty hard here and betting into two players turns our hand face up somewhat.  That being said, a XR OTT line seems like a reasonable one here.

I think #1 is real interesting in that I would think he wouldn't have the KK part of his range in his XC range unless he had a read on you but you don't really have that many hands.  If he has some small med PP's or AX that pick up str draws I can see that portion of his range XC'ing as well as 99-JJ.  I think his FD's continue betting near 100% too and its also interesting that the bottom portion of his FD are also stronger since those hit some str draws.  Even w/ that said, I personally probably just X back OTR as I think he could have those overpairs more often than I would like.  (I also agree that if CO is fishy at all or UTG opens a decent % I'm usually sqz'ing)

#2 I X OTR...I don't think I am getting calls from AQ/AT that often vs a nit.

#3 I like a XC OTR...We don't block any Fd's that he may bluff and he can turn a hand like 98 into a bluff as well. 

I just thought about blockers mainly since we block some of his better Kx that he might fold K7 or air...although I guess we beat most of his air.

Min 24-AJo: Would you ever consider bluff raising river here since it seems like a slightly weaker float range from villain plus board texture and some decent blockers on our part?

IDK...saying a hand like this plays well post flop means your basically 3b'ing such a wide range that would include almost every SC.  I know your outs are usually always live but unless you hit a draw you've almost got the equivalent of a bluff catcher even though your the aggressor.

Just sounds like your trying to fight aggression w/ aggression too blindly IMO.

2nd hand vs whale: We just X OTF; would you still do a value bet like the turn delay bet for both flop and turn if we had bet OTF?  Might have worded that slightly confusing ;) I just mean would you double barrel from the flop and expect to be ahead vs this type of player and still XC river?

33 min mark table 6: you decide to 5b since you think BB will have a decent 4b bluff range and are deep...are you not really considering blockers as much here since the reasons you already stated?

I think your your last post says it all...You probably know the +EV OTR...even if you XC, is that really +EV?

Do you think villain has a complete linear range vs you in his 6%? I think that dictates a lot here on how we proceed.

I honestly don't ever do this but could we consider leading OTT to guage villains range?  Its more than a "bet to see where we are at" since both our ranges are so strong.  Maybe we should only try this vs a different board texture where there could be in theory more draws...he more than likely would fold the bottom of his range, flat the middle, and raise the top...who knows though?

Not very happy to get two calls on the flop.  I'm XC OTT... TBH, not sure too many TP would bet there by btn if we miss a turn bet (although SPR is at 1). I'm just trying to get sdlike you suggested.

I didn't pay attention to his stats/player type enough...I would change my mind on X'ing except w this river. If you are read less and we know he is super passive, I wonder if we should X most of range OTR here as he probably just X's back most to all of his Ax as well.

I guess he can maybe have a couple miss FD's but w/ the A knocks that % down a lot.  I think that obv there isn't going to be too many boats in his range but I also wonder if we should either XC OTF or OTT? What in his range is calling 3 streets by the river? AT A9? might be to thin to go 3 streets here although it will put us in a sucky spot OOP.

I think you can make a case for folding the turn vs a MP open,

Personally I'd 3b pre...confused though-stats are for SB but hand history has SB folding OTF.