zinom1

I didn't know you could actually solve preflop on crev. I thought you were doing estimations using postflop equity realization.

How do you get the equity realization?

If he makes mistakes he loses ev. Because it's a zero sum game that ev went to us.

You need to XF some bluffs on turn. You can't just bet on turn any hand that you XRaised with as a bluff on flop. So altho flop XR is ok, turn should be XF as this hand is a really weak draw.

Easy call. he can have JJ or a bluff.

Fold pre.

Depending on villain-type everything can be a good play. this hand is already a buffcatcher on turn and I don't see villain having that many bluffs.

Preflop is a fold. As played call flop fold turn. but turn is close. I just don't see people firing into 2 people with enough bluffs. If he only has flushdraws as bluffs this is prob a -ev call on turn.

It's a fold preflop. As played I would ususally XC flop as the hand isn't vey strong. But XR is ok aswell. Then turnI would also XF.

flop is a check. As played turn is also a check. The hand is too weak to et for value and doens't need protetcion.

This ^

It's 0 ev in theory.

Preflop should be indifferent between shove and call. On flop your hand should be folding atleast sometimes because if you don't fold AK there you are basically never folding. Turn can sometimes start bluffing and river same thing.

iso bigger, like 10bb. As played don't shove flop. getting the money in over several streets maximizes ev with a polarized range. The exception is if you can deny equity by netting bigger which isn't the case given you don't need much protection.

If you always bet flushes here Villain should stab a lot vs turn check which would make checking turn with a flush higher ev than betting so you need some flushes to be checking turn. But there's nothing wrong with betting. I would bet small to include sets in my range.

I like it. The calling range vs small bet isnt that different of his calling range vs shove if we assume he never folds a Q. therefore you get more value by shoving.

Only way to know for sure is to pu it in a solver but yeah I think shoving river is standard.

This is usually a shove, but if villain is very aggressive, like turning pairs into bluffs vs river check, then checking might be better.

Very easy call. he's not even repping fullhouses. A fullhouse should call there to allow BU to call behind. He's repping 66-JJ so yeah easy call.

I would check because it allows IP to bet and then Sb to call while we can then XR. If IP is really passive then Im leading.

Get someone decent to rview your sessions. Thats the lowest hanging fruit.

It not very important which size you use as long as you bet the appropriate range for the used sizing.

This spot is pretty rare so its difficult to have good intuition. But I would be suprised to see villain check a full house on river and don't see him Xfolding Ak so I would have bet.

Don't 3bet flop. V is polarized. Spr is too high to re raise for protection.

Don't use this hand to bluff. You want to block Kx and/or 5x therefore qo with something like QJ(of hearts or clubs). If you are going to use Ax as bluffs, use the ones that block A5s.

Rockstar by Nickelback

I don't understand? You want sims that are less GTO?

This line is way underbluffed. In theory I think it's a call given he can be doing this with KT.
In practice, it's underbluffed but I also don't see many people XC twice with a set. I would default to playing like equilibrium and call it off.

You need to continue around 50% of your range vs the turn XR and then ~55% vs river shove. Therefore you need to defend ~27.5% of your turn betting range vs river shove. If your turn betting range is less than 27.5% flushes then any flush should be a pure call. If your turn betting range is more than 27.5% flushes and you call all of them vs turn XR, then you need to fold some vs river shove.

Zenith poker