zilbeee

of our value range*

Another interesting observation is that, they may overfold to cbets in this spot, but they also bet vs missed cbet quite wide (more than they should), so that also increases the ev of our range.

proggrezzive, this video is very good. but when you said people would be folding around 35%, as you checked in your db, is it against a 1/3 pot c-bet? I mean, they'll just fold less than a std c-bet, so you have to check the c-bet size you're practicing in this situation.

Yes, I do understand. I just mentioned that, since this does deviate a lot from pool's playing strategy, there is a lot of room for exploitation out here. And that players are playing a more aggressive strategy than they should be, if they were playing the perfect game. Thanks for the answers.

I don't think he would fold an ace with a busted fdraw OTT, and you seemingly overcbetting the flop, in the situation, for that 177% pot bet. Dont think it's bad to cbet if hes overfolding aces on the flop, but that also means, when he calls, the turn hits his range pretty hard, so I don't think KQo is a good candidate foi a second barrell. Anyway, amazingly played overall, great video! Hope to see more.

Oh, yea, and if aces are in practice a good bet on the turn, it's because people is underfolding queens. So yea =p

Thanks Tyler. I understand. But from a GTO perspective, that's the game to be played, isn't it? and anything deviating from that can be exploited. I mean, most of the field is betting aces on that turn, when it's a standard check. I feel like ppl is just deviating too much and aggressiveness overall is much praised. By the way, if he bets aces instead of checking, what does this may mean? It increases the ev our small bet (lead) with two pairs on the river, maybe?

Forrester, I really enjoy your videos, congratulations for this one. So, can we affirm that, overall, the games are more aggressive than they should be, in terms of cbetting, turn continuing range and value betting river? Important question for me as it applies to some recent changes I've noticed in my game; for example: checking aces in the second hand, as the pre flop aggressor, on the turn, is really my first option, as I probably agree with the entire range Pio suggested. The problem is that my overall aggression seems to have decreased a lot, so I don't know if I'm correcting my game or missing something. It does feel way more balanced. It just doesn't fit the "standards" anymore. This video seems to confirm it to some extent. What do you think?

Thanks

do you recommend it as a study tool?

Thanks Insilicio.

Isn't this NL100?

Great video. This type of video is amongst my favorites.

By the way, it's in the category "PLO", which I believe is wrong.

"nobody respects my limps"

Great comment.

not true actually..a player who plays nl100+ certainly knows how to beat nl50- regs

K3s imo is indeed value there. Q9s is a much more questionable call from villain. Only if tyler is correctly bluffing offsuit combinations with As that Qs flush becomes a call, but that's not true for the entire population.

Amazing video, man. Looking forward to these.

Great video. Amazing.

You seemed a bit disinterested in this video, and didn't play as well as you normally do. Just a criticism I felt I had to make, not personal and you are in my opinion one of the best trainers here.

In addition to answer this, should't the original raiser be checking back some overpairs here? i think its quite complicated to use his AK/AQ highs to bluff here and he may use them as bluffcatchers instead, mixing checking backs with overpairs at least some percentage of the time. What do you think? By the way even if he checks only high cards, considering how frequently you will call pre flop, they are still decent bluffcatchers on this board.

Not only the best player but also the best trainer out here..I really enjoy the way you explain your thought process in marginal situations, whereas many trainers don't. Keep it up.

By the way great video Sam Grafton, I'm really looking forward to see more of ICM related videos and I may suggest you to run even more calculations/simulations because I do really get lost sometimes, mainly in hyperturbo tournaments.

I'd like to see results for the 46o the short called against Pkaizer around 8:15. I don't think the very bottom of his range may be a call here..

ICM has no implication in HU (and winner takes) all tournaments. Obviously, since you have to win the match to step up in the prize, so it's the same as a winner takes all "mini" tournament.

What do you mean with "everytime sb opts for a passive strategy...checking flop is a dominated strategy"?

Great video. I would really enjoy the last 2 hands.