twoliters

Is the maniac label based on the 58/32 stats or have you seen them get wild postflop?

If those numbers are over a decent sample or you’ve seen villain show down combos that jive with a range that wide then I like adding this hand to my 3betting range - esp heads up.

I like x/r on this flop since you’re pushing so much equity against villains wide range and I expect them to cbet this board with a lot of hands.

Turn fold here is way too weak without a specific read. If villain is a maniac or at least has a wide range they’re betting here with hands that you beat. I dont think raising does any good here but you can def see a river.

I dont like 3betting this hand against a tag villain UTG. The sidecards wont help on many flops so you’re banking on your set and flushes to win a large pot. If thats the case Im fine calling and letting in callers for a multiway pot with position on the pfr - at least at microstakes.

With a flop that wet, an spr of 2 and not much equity against AA** I def like a check on this flop.

I think the turn is a fold. Sure, you pick up outs, but given that you’re up against an AA** heavy range the reverse implied odds are real. Im only fistpumping on a non-heart 4 river and the A of hearts.

If I got to river this way then Id probably bluff too because I overbluff blockers. But maybe since villain also has two nut blockers and two flush draws plus the 789 wrap missed AND the spr is less than 0.5 we can assume we’ll get looked up light more often here so its not a great bluff spot.

AK with two big suits is a fine 3bet sometimes vs cutoff. Readless I def skew aggressive. .

I like the flop bet bc I think the population will overfold, you block the good two pairs which will raise you while lots of non-nut drawing hands will call.

Id stay aggressive on the turn and bet to punish the portion of villains range that improved but doesnt love facing heat - T87 w/ spades, 654 w/ spades, J98x type hands, other random garb with equity and do this with the intention to often barrel river. But that play is super spewy according to the solver.

Vision is playing this turn as primarily check and fold to a bet without both flush draws. Caveat - super new to using vision so that could be wrong but makes sense if villain will err toward showdown with marginal hands and let us realize our equity?

Villains pot size lead heavily weights his range towards hands with much equity, and I'd assume mostly made hands in a micro-stakes player pool. Id fold flop most of the time. I'd rather have blockers to stronger hands - 9TT, JTX, big diamonds - than blockers to the non-nut hands. So no, I dont really like bluffing this hand.
On the turn I feel like you have to bet this card if you're calling the flop, but I dont feel good about it. Id rather bet a 5, 6, J, Q, or a non-board pairing club or diamond. You only picked up a small amount of equity, you dont have any blockers to the nuts and you have no flush blockers so villain can stick around with some draws. Also if Im betting here then Im betting bigger.
That river card doesnt change anything in the villains mind. If they thought they had the best hand on the turn then they still believe that. You dont block flush draws so maybe you can get villain to fold pair+flush draw type hands with a smaller, half pot size, bet? However villains flop play suggests a stronger made hand and the turn check-call doesnt contradict that read so if you're betting then I think you should pot it to try to convince him to fold a made hand.

All that said, fold flop.

I wouldn't bet river here. Without knowing any specifics of villains fishiness, I think sets and two pair are still in her range when she calls the flop. With SPR=20 on a board this dynamic I would expect some sets, esp w/out redraws, to pot control in position. We dont have blockers to made hands, do have a third diamond and her nut flush draws hit at least top pair on the turn which leads me to giving up.