trivikrr

Amazing video, please make the turn and flop ones

Toy games explaining how adding raising as a strategic option changes the equilibrium. Games to understand raising better and the role of raising and position together.Starting with River only and then perhaps turn and flop gets more complex. some hands to illustrate with sims or even pure dry theory is fine. Krystof has some videos of this nature, great if he does it.

Thanks Kalupso , i saw the movie searching for bobby fischer, will read his book
cruX thats a good one, but what i am seeking is a framework, certainly not a rules based algorithm, as i am aware that is not possible because of information asymmetry but a framework in how to think in spots. When i am calling down, for example i can think how much equity do i need and how much equity do i have. I was talking more on the lines of taking a range, a board and an opponent and doing a whole range analysis street by street, with every hand in my range.

I lack the theoretical understanding to slot the hands in my range for an example board into specific subsections.

I was seeking some guidance on how to do that range work. but i do have more clarity now, thanks

DNegs98 that's really helpful. Thanks for turning a general query into something specific and attempting to provide a framework as a solution to the problem.
Samu Patronen i am sorry the question is so general, but i think inspite of its generality there is some material in the question to come up with some answer, like dnegs did and i am sure matthew janda would have something to say as an answer. But poker is too wide and every situation has to be dealt differently is not a satisfactory answer. If u think it has to be dealt with on a formation to basis then provide some guideline on how to study formations. That is difficult for a beginner. So as someone who is more experienced it is expected that he/she has put some thought into the millions of formation that poker has and has some kind of decision making framework which is not algorithmic as poker is too complicated but at least heuristical. But thanks for the answer, will try my best.

I understand your position.
But the challenge is where should any study begin from. It has to begin from an ideal point. An equilibrium where no change can happen, as everything is perfect. Only in imperfection we need a change to make it perfect.
MDF is not simplistic, it is perfect.
If opp is bluffing more we know we have to defend more, but more than what. What is the anchor. It is MDF. We have to defend more than MDF
If opp is value heavy and underbluffing we have to defend less, but less than what. Less than MDF.
MDF is the theoretical correct frequency of defence against an opponent who is playing well and we have no incentive to do anything else other than what MDF suggests.
But it is our job to figure out how our opponent is imbalanced and whatever we do, we do it with MDF as our reference. We always use MDF as our compass
So MDF can never be outdated, it never instructed us to defend at MDF

How is the concept of MDF outdated? I ask it not from a position of challenge but of curiosity. My more basic qurey is how can fundamental things beccome outdated

Love ur video. I play low stakes cash. I am really struggling with practice. Not talkin about the the game here, we talkin about practice :)
Suppose i want to practice c-betting, how to design a drill to practice it.
And how to practice more extensive lines like u cbet as the pf raisor, bet gets called, u cbet turn, bet gets called, u cbet river. How to practice skills in isolation, like 3 betting, c-betting, value betting and how to practice bigger lines, common lines