Hello, guys. I really enjoyed reading this thread as many others. And as typing my first message I would like to thank Phil Galfond for this site and all pros who still are happy to share their sights to the game. And I hope you don't mind to hear and maybe to answer a question from a guy who barely knows the game and english language (sorry for mistakes). The thought which crossed my mind is next. If our hand, as a top set plus smth, is faced up for the villain then on the turn he has 27 "outs". 24 for wrap representing and extra 3 for only flush rep. Maybe flush rep is too optimistic but anyways 24 is more than a half of the deck, and find the right ratio of bluff isnt a big deal for this spot so we can assume he would play the river perfectly. So finally to my question - is a pot-size bet on the turn a right decision?
Aug. 11, 2013 | 8:39 p.m.
All results loaded
TRAIN WITH THE BEST
Learn from the Run It Once Pro Team with two new instructional videos every day.
Hello, guys. I really enjoyed reading this thread as many others. And as typing my first message I would like to thank Phil Galfond for this site and all pros who still are happy to share their sights to the game.
And I hope you don't mind to hear and maybe to answer a question from a guy who barely knows the game and english language (sorry for mistakes).
The thought which crossed my mind is next. If our hand, as a top set plus smth, is faced up for the villain then on the turn he has 27 "outs". 24 for wrap representing and extra 3 for only flush rep. Maybe flush rep is too optimistic but anyways 24 is more than a half of the deck, and find the right ratio of bluff isnt a big deal for this spot so we can assume he would play the river perfectly. So finally to my question - is a pot-size bet on the turn a right decision?
Aug. 11, 2013 | 8:39 p.m.