strikerp

Different formulas for HM2 and PT4.
And yes, afaik 45/42/41 in PT4 seems to be more on the passive side.

Thanks for the great video.
One question regarding this topic, what do you think about betting whole range with a small sizing on some flops in 3bet pots, but oop?
Especially from the blinds in a restealed pot, there are some flops we have a huge equity and nut advantage, but being oop makes it hard to play on turn and river + villain can easier defend vs e.g. a 1/3 pot cbet, so I am not sure about betting the whole range is max ev.
Looking forward for the next video!:)

Hi,

21:45 do you recommend a polarized squeezing range in spots like this (sounds so if you think about squeezing with hands like 96s) or isn't it better to play kind of a linear squeeze range here?

22:45 what is the intention of the cbet here, folding out weak AXs hands by fireing 3 barrels and deny equity on his check/folding rangee? I mean this combo blocks some hands we want to fold out with 2 or 3 barrels like JJ,KK, we have a bit showdown value and can call nearly every turn and villain is never folding a hand on the flop that beats us, so maybe check back (sometimes) with this combo could be a nice line?

Hi,
how do we play the turn after raise the 852 flop with hands like TT if villain just called vs our raise? Imo his turn range should be very overpair heavy (obv. he can easily play b/c with them on this kind of flop), so we never have a value jam here imo. Just try to get a free showdown by checking back most of the turns?

Hi,
1:27, 98s (right table) otf, what's your cbet frequency and sizing here? I would cbet around 40% of my range with a bigger sizing, and 9h8h with backdoor flush+straight draw would be within this range, what are your bluffs on this board if not some hands like the 9h8h?:)
Thanks for the vid!