loki

im a big fan of phil.. but i must say the approach of not making smaller limits on the plo side is kindda of an insult. plus this site is in euro.. , plo is such a wild game with ton variance already.. why in the world would you not have smaller stakes.. if the site claims it has all players in mind and wants ppl to have pokerdream alive. its a snobish approach. 10 euro plo game will requiere big bankroll to play properly 500 euro or more..( not what a small casual or starting player would be eagered to invest right away.. some ppl deposit max 50 to 100 bucks which in euro means less money) being that the site has no insureplay or run twice feature... which is also a stupid idea to have named the site rio... now you can not implement such usefull tool as '''run twice'' feature much used by most plo players including phil. it is NOT a good reason ''site name'' to NOT have that the feature.. specially for plo.. we are in the middle of a pandemic.. what in the world are you waiting for to implement the smaller stakes for plo?? or a ''early cashout or run twince '' feature.. if you are for real about capturing all players not just forumgeeks/ players then you have to snap out of it.. you may deserve to fail if you dont adapt/implement changes. new site shloud make even more efforts for the smaller players.

im a big fan of phil.. but i must say the approach of not making smaller limits on the plo side is kindda of an insult. plus this site is in euro.. , plo is such a wild game with ton variance already.. why in the world would you not have smaller stakes.. if the site claims it has all players in mind and wants ppl to have pokerdream alive. its a snobish approach. 10 euro plo game will requiere big bankroll to play properly 500 euro or more..( not what a small casual or starting player would be eagered to invest right away.. some ppl deposit max 50 to 100 bucks which in euro means less money) being that the site has no insureplay or run twice feature... which is also a stupid idea to have named the site rio... now you can not implement such usefull tool as '''run twice'' feature much used by most plo players including phil. it is NOT a good reason ''site name'' to NOT have that the feature.. specially for plo.. we are in the middle of a pandemic.. what in the world are you waiting for to implement the smaller stakes for plo?? or a ''early cashout or run twince '' feature.. if you are for real about capturing all players not just forumgeeks/ players then you have to snap out of it.. you may deserve to fail if you dont adapt/implement changes. new site shloud make even more efforts for the smaller players.

im a big fan of phil.. but i must say the approach of not making smaller limits on the plo side is kindda of an insult. plus this site is in euro.. , plo is such a wild game with ton variance already.. why in the world would you not have smaller stakes.. if the site claims it has all players in mind and wants ppl to have pokerdream alive. its a snobish approach. 10 euro plo game will requiere big bankroll to play properly 500 euro or more..( not what a small casual or starting player would be eagered to invest right away.. some ppl deposit max 50 to 100 bucks which in euro means less money) being that the site has no insureplay or run twice feature... which is also a stupid idea to have named the site rio... now you can not implement such usefull tool as '''run twice'' feature much used by most plo players including phil. it is NOT a good reason ''site name'' to NOT have that the feature.. specially for plo.. we are in the middle of a pandemic.. what in the world are you waiting for to implement the smaller stakes for plo?? or a ''early cashout or run twince '' feature.. if you are for real about capturing all players not just forumgeeks/ players then you have to snap out of it.. you may deserve to fail if you dont adapt/implement changes. new site shloud make even more efforts for the smaller players.

im a big fan of phil.. but i must say the approach of not making smaller limits on the plo side is kindda of an insult. plus this site is in euro.. , plo is such a wild game with ton variance already.. why in the world would you not have smaller stakes.. if the site claims it has all players in mind and wants ppl to have pokerdream alive. its a snobish approach. 10 euro plo game will requiere big bankroll to play properly 500 euro or more..( not what a small casual or starting player would be eagered to invest right away.. some ppl deposit max 50 to 100 bucks which in euro means less money) being that the site has no insureplay or run twice feature... which is also a stupid idea to have named the site rio... now you can not implement such usefull tool as '''run twice'' feature much used by most plo players including phil. it is NOT a good reason ''site name'' to NOT have that the feature.. specially for plo.. we are in the middle of a pandemic.. what in the world are you waiting for to implement the smaller stakes for plo?? or a ''early cashout or run twince '' feature.. if you are for real about capturing all players not just forumgeeks/ players then you have to snap out of it.. you may deserve to fail if you dont adapt/implement changes. new site shloud make even more efforts for the smaller players.

they should eliminate splashing pots.. and just stick to legends. or if they are using the excuse that helps keep game safe then just make it symbolic. just 5% rake spalshed. i just need serious rake plan. like pp but here sould be better.

agree, low rake plo. asap. and smaller stakes

such usefull tool as '''run twice'' feature much used by most plo players including phil. it is NOT a good reason ''site name'' to NOT have that the feature.. specially for plo.. we are in the middle of a pandemic.. what in the world are you waiting for to implement the smaller stakes for plo?? or a ''early cashout or run twince '' feature.. if you are for real about capturing all players not just forumgeeks/ players then you have to snap out of it..