stianchrister

Nick Johnson Not just what it could look like, but what it should look like. I'm thinking some real range construction stuff with some extracted heuristics about how to construct our ranges and be reasonably balanced in a spot, especially as a hand goes over multiple streets.

--Edit--
It would be interesting to see if we could find some GTO-approximate heuristics from solver insights about how to construct our ranges on common board textures and so forth.

Sure, we know it's better to bet polarized than merged in PLO, but on KK5, there's a lot of hands to pick from because we whiff a lot on that board. Which hands are better for bluffing? What about other board textures?

Can we see any patterns from the solvers and get some heuristics from it for a handful of board textures?

I think that would be a goldmine.

I think a video that takes a look at how to find bluffs on turns and rivers would be quite interesting.

Check back the flop.

If we're flatting AAxx preflop (which I kinda like when they're dry), I think we should have a leading range on the flop. Our ranges are both really strong, and I think we should have a leading range on these kinda boards where we smash top set because our strong range makes it more likely that he'll check back a lot of hands that he would bet against a weaker range.

We can lead something like sets, massive combo draws, and some draws that aren't good enough to check-call.

As played, I'd bet the turn. He can call a lot of worse hands.

I call the river because theory, but expect to lose because PLO5 players are tight-passive postflop.

I'm in the same situation as yourself. Totally interested in this.