6000 bb

More of a lets challenge Snowie for 600 hands at a time and see who wins post. Sorry to put it in the wrong place.
No one even cares to play 600 challenge, I know its nothing, but no one is going to play more. 100 orbits or enough for 5 ops to steal your 100bb stack blinds was the idea behind a min 600 hands.
Nevermind. delete it if u want, no one took it up any way.

not counting pre. Was it a good call? Im asking about the play, post flop.

Great video!

picasso sketch tablet at table,
https://www.amazon.com/Simbans-PicassoTab-Drawing-Beginner-Bluetooth/dp/B071GY6994
or the Airmob hud glasses but they only show vipip/pfr/3bet but at least they record the hands. pretty expensive like 300 battery only lasts 6 hours

7.70 a hand over 600

I think its a fold.

why? disregarding the pre flop standard fold play?
no I'm not trolling. Sprinkles really are for closers
assuming your in pre------u would fold river? or turn?

good R on turn, just call river. nh
(if u did want to get it all in then push T, or raise bigger the turn is the place here) (if not,(as played) then just call river)

2) flopzilla toggle to combos mode, then a pyrmid minimum defense stratagy based on what is showing down and winning per table or player, you translate by the (knowing these numbers facts) vs the (knowing your current opponents tendencies at this point in time)
you may have him ranged wrong........or not. nh

sprinkles are for closers,

ch/f

interesting

someone might find this interesting:

After a few years of only so-so (but still world #1) results, Magnus
has I believe won five tournaments in a row this year and he is
leading in the sixth, currently running in Croatia.

He recently stated that he has learned some new chess ideas from
AlphaZero, but more importantly he has shown up better prepared in the
openings than his opponents, probably for the first time in his
career. Yet his preparation has taken an extraordinary spin. Other
grandmasters prepare the opening in the hope of achieving an early
advantage over their opponents. Magnus’s preparation, in contrast, is
directed at achieving an early disadvantage in the game, perhaps
willing to tolerate as much as -0.5 or -0.6 by the standards of the
computer (a significant but not decisive disadvantage, with -2
signifying a lost position). Nonetheless these are positions “out of
book” where Magnus nonetheless feels he can outplay his opponent, and
this is mostly opponents from the world top ten or fifteen.

So far it is working. One commentator wrote: “Magnus is turning into
a crushing monster just like Garry. He isn’t the strangler anymore”

And it is hard to counter someone looking for a disadvantage!

I am always looking for critiques for or against. so thank you for that.
I just think poker is an Art. and like in Art you have to use math like the golden ratio and such to make a great piece, and you have to know the rules and then u can break them and be a great artist. Solvers are just a Lexus, a over glorified Toyota. They are fun too look at, teach a great an awesome defense or baseline if u find ur self in a game where u got rattled and need to shell up and recoup. But in play .......on an off topic kind of Magnus Carlson is now deviating from gto play early on -ev on purpose in order to put his oponents in strange situations they have not exercised before (because who in their right mind would deviate) its not bad in my opinion to do -ev plays preflop, because thats how your going to get alot of valuse on latter streets where things really matter. so a concious mistake pre and maybe flop is ok if your going to a)
well this will be too long. In my opinion .....
it really only a large deviation on the turn setup by the pre small error for a non centric situation.
solvers are playing against other solvers, they would nt i dont think go for a pot that went from .75 to 20 or what ever it was, but people(some) would.
why is pushing a straight on the turn that blocks the nuts a large loss? its either a small loss 1.50 in value lost (made up for by crazy drawing image) , or a large gain x15ev.....at the slight risk of pushing into nuts or a draw getting their...but nothing is 100% so I think if I have any idea that he may venture to call it off I should rep the semi. even if it does not work I loss 1.50 in value, but gain in image and do it again latter. just my feeling. I can take the 8$ here and use it for other -ev plays small errors pre thats 9-16 small errors I get to make pre, I can then bluff those and get the right oponent to fold, chk/fold another opponent like this one, or on the of chance I hit a stright I shouldnt hanve from utg get paid off from a face up range. It just my opinion.

lol..Samu Patronen "dont drive either" thats funny. I drive like an old lady.
I hear you. But there is something to it. Like in the book think fast think slow. I want to play from the subconscious. I play live and most (not all) but most decisions are abc. almost everyone is underolled risk aversion is high and except for a few shooting stars everything is under bluffed
a quick example, I am playing 1/2 live, I have KK, someone utg opens to 40 (my first thought is fold out of turn and go to the bathroomNOW). Which is unheard of 1 2 40. thats 20x. I think about it and say Im going to flat and if no ace on flop push. flop jxx rainbow he bets 100 I push and say nice hand before I see his AA. What was the point of that? Pre flop I have nothing invested 0. The guy is practically 95% has AA, ...........I can abc the game in a good mood for hours with no problems why not just toss the KK pre? its not just that one hand, its the all the hands I am going to play after are now tilted. Its such a simple decioun pre 0 move on and forget. It would be different if I opened and he 3 bet, or if it was 2/5 with 2 people that had history 3betting and then me to act .
not just that, there is something about not thinking and speed playing....I can do it online because I dont care about the 10 because Im trying something out, the speed play thing no think. It works. I think practice is right. I wish live poker was faster.
Im not bragging but i can speed play snoiwe 8 5 6 oppnents and beat it everymorning over 600 hands. I dont even know what is really going on in the hand I just know if I raise this flop 2/3 hes gone mostly. and all his other bet or check meanings. I can do it with snoiwe because I play it everyday. and also a big factor is it sees strights and u can call then bomb turn completion with one of the stright cards if u flatted pre and it sees it and drops. (value in bluffing) at live not so much. So ....that style is not going to work. quite the incoherant ramble going. yeah your right you cant speed think because all snowie is the same, all driving is the same, but each person is an individual that requires time and profiling.

my hand study for the day:
you played it Snowie perfect per range play. 10d made no difference(less then .8% switching out other Ts.......hole card line spefic line said fold Turnn.....

range river play

line river play

Turn Specific line play with your holding

best hand at showdown per snowie ranges vs snowie:
flop after you call 15.38 74%%
turn after he bets 36 down to 31%%
river 24%

I think the Turn is the inflection point. I think fold Turn in a vacuum.....unless history or stats. Ill put it in snowie for fun...

Holonomy
"Fair enough if you wouldn't consider it a cooler. The point I am trying to make is this is a long way out from a theory perspective"

(is it?))(you dont play theory, you use theory to see how far away and which ways, lines they are deviating FROM theory to send a arrow thru that window they opened so in theory.....you find the windows they left open, and how far open, long a way out as they go,and u mirrow oppsite match as long a way out in the other direction of perfect theory line.in theory all the windows of their fortress are closed ans so are yours, you are both trading small pots at near 0 until one of you finds an open window first and adjusts OFF theory to take advantage,or until they make themselves vulnurable by opening a window, you take notice of the which window they have open and send an arrow thru that window....which you have to also open one of your windows to send the arrow but the risk was well worth it, then I close my window maybe.thats my theory anyyway)

"I still don't get what you meant by him being clever? Was it the blocker thing I said?"

(I don't know how to explain, kind of blocker, kind of unblocker, kind of board, kind of what would I do that with? how many combo? What would I do that with?a hand that really wanted a call or a hand that really wanted a fold, what did I precivably want? so he did the opposite of what I wanted, as he saw it...but I saw a little deeperr

"Also saw another post where you said you were struggling at 0.01/0.02?"
( the struggle was boredom not figuring out tactics....)

"and was wondering whether you are regularly taking funky lines like this and losing yourself a lot of value"
(...emmmmmmmm I don't think the line was funky....I think the hand was just interesting))
" your reads must be very, very strong" (thank u)

thank u Samu Patronen , some prior history between us with utg....but I agree with the analysis in a vacuum and appreciate it.

I raised pre to get the button not with 69....cards only matter at showdown

I thing against population the shove is probably losing as they will
have J9 enough of the time to make you wish you hadn't done that.(no) When that happens you will probably feel hard done by(lol no)
and that you got coolered.(no)
You didn't with that sizing.( ididnt say i did, nor would i)

It was a postion raise. I play blind mostly here

"flop falcon" would let you( a person )see and compare filtered flops......It wont work to feed into pio for a input into the gto player game though... the ideal person to e-mail would be Dough Hull he could write you one if he has not already written one.

.01/,02 cent player here- weighing in here: mine is wwsf50% (but my tables in general do not payoff value and are very good at folding) .......however I don't think you can only look at YOUR stats all together alone. Because your stats have to be measured (think of like the old school equalizers bar on the radio) up and down DEpending on your table or opponent. So while 46-50 maybe considered the right place to be........if your table is calling alot then 37-40 might be optimal(dodging rocks thrown at me here,the mob ohhhh). imo your stats should be measured against your opponents stats.
emmmmmmmmmmmm, instead of calling pre, take all your suited bucketc and either call or raise,,,,,,,,take all your non suited that you are calling with and Fold. Use the suitableness to get more aggressive on flops and turns. That may help.....or just totally wreck your game. Your a winning player congratulations! I would make any changes you decide to make slow and .....observantly to the big picture...because your whole strategy together is a winning one so like in chaos theory....change one little thing and it could have a devastating effect as in your stats being ohhh so pretty and a losing player. I would focus more on extracting more value from your value hands and methods to do so based on your opponent, ie does he attack weakness on turn?