sesh_bot

Hi, I enjoyed the video and there were definitely some spots I found interesting!

Something I've been thinking about a bit and came up over the course of the video, (I'm someone who mostly plays regular tables as opposed to zoom so may be slightly different): how much do you attribute to hands that you're not involved in - specifically when it involves a fun and not so fun player. For instance if the reg shows up with a slightly unusually played or face-up hand will you be taking notes? Or think its better to continue on the premise that he/she is also adapting?

In essence - will it affect your reads one way or another when involved in a similar pot with them? Or do you think tagging and making notes on a player based predominantly on how they've play against you is a safer way to proceed?

Cheers

Like the video and really nice touch at the end.

I don't know if you have plans to do this, but something I'd personally be very interested in seeing is some narrower examples from previous hands you've played and how you applied (or wish you'd applied) psychology techniques in certain situations.

Cheers