savant111

John...I enjoy your vids.

Just wanted to point out that there is entertainment value to showing the results of the hands as well.

For example, In the KJ hand I thought the 2nd caller had a tighter range than you gave him credit for. Seeing the actual hand wouldn't of proved if I was right (though it could of proved if I was wrong), but it would of added to the viewing experience.

Same thing with not showing any hands from the HU portion in your math series. I appreciate you trying to maximize educational time, but I'd encourage you to think about what the audience might be thinking as well. It'll improve you vid making skills.

Great video as usual! Concepts well explained and articulated.

Hi John,

First off I really enjoyed the series and got a lot out of it.

I had a question around the 28:30 mark of the video in the 88 hand when u are figuring out the villains 4 bet jam range, you discount the top end of his range. Your rationale makes sense to do so. Why not discount the bottom of his range too? We had A9s, QJs, and like KT in there. I don't think he's 4 bet jamming with those holdings a 100% of time. Shouldn't we discount so,e combos from the bottom too?

Great video James, I love the 65 river call on the second hand you reviewed. I probably make the call too, but would have a much tougher time determining the if the villain has a 7. Awesome job breaking down the different 7x combos and eliminating them. I learned from you there...thanks a lot.