raphayakawa
3 points
I've used both products widely. Each has a few specific pro's and con's. Right now vision felt like it suits my needs best.
But indeed, there not even being any response to this topic from staff makes it all the more evident that they're more interested in raising prices and rent seeking than actual product development and improvement.
Oct. 30, 2024 | 6:52 a.m.
I think Visions is very useful but for 200$/month plans I find it strange that improvements such as following are not made:
- Clear out all obvious bugs that the trainer is riddled with
- Proper hosting so the thing works smoothly for all the data
- Make a more serious effort expanding the library. More rivers, add in MW solutions.
The reason you can charge 200$ in spite of this is because of a duopoly market. It wouldn't hurt being preemptive before a competitor comes with a superior product which will not be that hard to make.
thanks Mikey appreciate that.
Apoligise if i came off very negative, i was a little frustrated with the program
happy to get in touch and help improve the user experience, im a heavy user and know the program quite well
Nov. 2, 2024 | 6:17 p.m.