peaceandlove

hi, good vid, ty

05:57 (TJo) - what about limp-call to iso preflop, limo-fold to shove? i think its much about who is BB in our eyes but in overall summary 23bbs eff in this kind of spot vs most players limp would be most optimal way to do it. Instead of taking highrisk variance spot 4bshoving there instead smallball having powerfull stack and we are in situation in tourney that im not sure we really want put preasure on preflop instead of postflop, all about personall feeling gameflow anyway.

i like this kind of spot analisis format, 2-3 more hands peer video would be perfect

its loading part 2 for me not part 3, also in place with part#2 video its loading part#1 for me

hey, decent video ty

few of my thoughts during watching:

00:57 (T5o) - personally i see more value in shoving in this kind of spot becouse i see a lot of players l/folding there like 95% of the time, with i like becouse with hand like T5o even IP i don't really want play postflop vs range that is dominating us a lot i assume (a lot of all good equity hands like connectors, better Tx's, etc etc all that they don't want probably shove pre and wan't to see a flop) i haven't made solid calculations but with this kind of badpost equity hand i prefer shippre

05:14 (QJs) - i think there could be more value by raising turn a bit lower like to 3.6k-3.8k and betting turn like 4-6k, shove most rivers. When i see this kind of donkflop from BB, i see a lot of 7x connected to board (78 79 J7 67), Tx's like T8 T9 TJ, 89 J8 J9 type hands so i think its more profitable to keep this kind of range by allowing him still calling down turn bet instead of fold him by shoving, becouse i see we are crushing his overall range and i see playing this hand on 3streets could be better instead shoving turn, what ya think.

06:51 (JJ) - at 14bb'S i see still a lot of value by raising it instead of shoving pre, by shoving we make them fold in big % of the time hands like 55 66 77sometimes ATs AJo and not letting to make for BB light stopngo, i still see sometimes some crazy 3b/fold even vs this kind of stack so i think we are lossing nothing by minraising, not afraid to play post ( we won't have much oppurunity there to play post, only vs btn probably) so minraise in my opinion would still induce much more action and make more profit in longrun there instead of shoving pre. Even if this raise looks so strong i think this doesn't matter much becouse the ranges in worst scenario would be the same if We shoving (like calling us wiht 77 ajs aq, the same after minraise).

11:12 (99) - similar story as with the JJ hand, only biggest minus there is that we allow BB defend wide all his broadways type hand that we are playing post ~@ 13bbs eff, but still we have possition and comparing to other positive aspects of raising and inducing istead of shoving, first option win for me. Of course, both options are making huge profit, but i like finding most optimal gameplay for everyhand and even if differences are not that huge in shortrun, but in longrun they could make some decent profit.(according to hrc after put optimistic ranges there isn't that big difference between shoving and minraise inducing, mr induce is better but only for like 0.3bb~ so not that much) but still, ranges are dynamic and im assumed minimal reshoving/calling ranges and we can see in some % of the time more wider plus wide defending range by BB with hands like 45s 56s 67s A2-A8s etc etc that we are making decent profit that HRC doesn't count this)

Hey, nice vid i like your productions :)
some thoughts if you don't mind

01:41 (AKo) - Do you consider from time to time flatting preflop this hand there? I know its autoprofitable snap 4bshove most of the time BUT sometimes in this kind of spot where i know im going get called by like 99+ AK to my 4b shove, and i know villian 3b range pre IP is going be wide in this kind of spot (and most like focused on a lot of weaker Ax's like A5s, A8-9s, AT-AJo, Kx's like KT-KJo KQo sometimes so overall i see villians 3b ranges in this kind of spot capped on weakish ax's and kx's that are too close to flatt there but too good to fold pre so im thinking, isn't it good spot to call pre considering this kind of range that we have so much edge versous even playing OOP it could be maybe even more profitable then obv standard 4b shove. Anyway i think it's also much depend on villian tendences overall so, just curious on your point of view in this kind of spot what i said.

Try meditation. Working with your emotions, slow down inner dialogue, acceptation on things that you don't have any control in life i.e winning 50/50 flip, instead focus on that you do have control like taking most optimal decisions in every hand and dont letting emotions take control over you while grinding. Rembember only you have control over your life, emotions, feelings, thoughts in head.

cheers

hey, nice vid ty, some my thoughts

16:22 (AKs) - vs 40bbs eff utg open, im not sure its most optimal way to go by 3b/5b broke there. As played i think its pretty decent spot to call his 4b, keep his wide 4betting range (if he is capable to do it in spot like this) so his range would look like JJ+,KTs,QTs,AJo,KQo in my opinion, so top rane to stackoff JJ+, and decent equity hands with blockers too good to flatt being utg vs IP3b and too good to fold so some suited broadways like qts kts some aj kqo imo, so we are keeping his entire 4betting range and some decent %of the hands that we are dominating postflop and can get more value  instead of shove and stackoff vs his probably JJ/QQ+ range and make this spot so close and pretty high variance in longrun becouse imo in spot like this regs won't be able to stackoff light without dynamic and having this kind of stack in turbos in my opinion it could be more optimal to search more postflop edges and more smallball situations with possition like here even flatting pre instead of light 3b/5b broking, but just my few cents let me know what you think.

18:12 (Q9s) - for me it seems like we could go there even smaller like 2.2-2.5kish and easy fold without any equity vs BB reshove even if it looks weak, it won't still be profitable to call even when we would need 0.22~% equity to b/e call vs his defending range @ bb in this spot his range is going be capped on broadways,connector, maybe few ax combos like A9s-A8s,K9s+,Q9s+,J9s+,T9s,98s,ATo,KJo+,QJo but maybe its too wider range, even vs this we have only 17% equity so still not profitable to call.

19:25 (K7s) - i don't think its going be profitable and most optimal way to r/c bigblind. I mean its profitable overall after we raise to r/c but according to HRC vs BB reshoving range ~ 20.1%, 22+ A2s+ A7o+ K9s+ KJo+ Q9s+ JTs with im not sure its not too light and some part of his range could be focused on defending broadways/connector instead of reshoving there so in most optmimistic way its going be breakeven spot or proftable on like 0.1-0.3bb max and earning like 600chips in longrun in this spot isn't worth to imo in this situation in tournament having this kind of stack we could pass some marginal profitable spots.

22:10 (TT) - i think overall even if regs know, that some players are capable to mr/f in this kind of spot i think dont so we would make more profit by raising instead of shoving there since we have 8~bb stack that we are close to be commited to call. we could cutoff sOme hands like 66 77 88  99 maybe some ATs from regs calling range after we minraise and scary them off, and they would mostly like call off our shove.Also we give  so good equity for bigblind reg to defend all his suited broadways KQo Aj type hands to fit/fold mostly and @10big i dont think so its good way to induce something having  this kind of stack on bigblind becouse hE would be more capped on shove like TT+ AK and defend rest but i can be wrong.

23:55 (TJs) - i dont know that vell flush_entity oppening ranges but overall, looking at these stakcsizes where he have 8,5bb stack and 5bb stack that he is mostly like commited to R/c them i dont think so his raise/calling and raise/folding %range ratio would be wide enough to make our shove profitable with decent edge there in my opinion.

Giving for him optimal oppening range like:
16.6%, 55+ A7s+ A5s A9o+ K9s+ KJo+ QTs+ QJo JTs T9s (50% of QJo,A7s,55s combos)
(its going be sometimes wideR, sometimes tighter, in longrun i think its going be Secound option so less hands like K9s A9o A5s QJo)

and raise/calling vs our reshove : 5.1%, 99+ AQs+ AQo+, and 50% of 88's

after putting these numbers we are earning like 0.8BB giving these ranges in longrun so its like 5k chips, im not sure its enough having this kind of stacksizes (3 shortstacks) and some icm factor (i dont know how deep in tourney we are now, if it would be like semi/ft i would be more on the fold side) so in my opinion its a bit too wide in this kind of spot personally i would reshove like 77/88 AJs AQo KQs there but it's not mistake for sure to shove wider but i think it could be less optimal and more profitable overall would be tighter up our range there.

33:28 (ATo)- like you said, its so think becouse his reshoving range haveing 1short @sb and knowing that he is almost always commited to your raise, i don't think so his reshoving range is going be wider then 66+ ATs+ AJo+ KQs and vs this reshoving range we are earning 0.5BB by cEV when we call but there is so much icm factor and future edge spots that i think, we don't want take almost b/e cev spot by raise/calling this even if it looks weakish its much more profitable and optimal to pass and have 25~bbs stack and still being chipleader and put preasure and still pump steals and win chips with lowvariance without showdown instead of taking close if even profitable spots like this one.

34:08 (TJo) - imo its clear fold, so bad stacksizes for us and icm factor while there are two shortstacks at btn and sb, i think its much more optimal to pass this spot and keep our stack at reshoviung range with still some foldequity then r/f and beign less then 10bbs when blinds come to us and level of blinds would increase to 15/30k. Also we have good reg @bigblind that would be capable to defend all suited broadways/AT AT AQ type hands and we won't be comfrotable to play @15bbs even with possition there i think. Again its cev+ open but still almost b/E (like 0.5bb profitable) and imo we have to keep more icm factor and edge there instead of taking close cev spots.

35:30 (A2o) - imo its very weak open, even vs stacksizes that we are R/folding to anyone i still dont think its going be profitable enough with Ax blocker according to hrc. Overall i think its more optimal while having chipleader there fold more r/folding hands like this one and give chance for players to stackoff wider like bvb, btn vs sb/bb, hj vs bb  etc instead of stealing all the time chips and earning very low % like 0.5-1bb max by cEV max.

37:42 (63o) - VS 9.5bb BB i think its still good enough and it won'T never be exploitable to mr/fold there instead of shoving, like balancing our worst 20% of the range and top 15-20 to R/c and shove rest.

cheers, let me know what do you think

hey, like your videos

my few thoughts if you would like to answer to them sometime would be nice

03:29 (TT) - what do you think about xb flop when bord is so dry but his flatting SB range
@25bb is pretty much focused on broadways/connectors type hands with would play very often
x/r there, so xb evaluate could be better move then b/f imo with such a good hand there
where there are so much draws vs guy who have decent c/r percentage he can do balance it
much with pure air/middle equity hands and value hands so dont think b/f is best there

03:53 (QJo) - what do you think about iso small like 480-600 vs 22/6 with possition vs
weak player i think its gonna show some decent profit there

04:12 (A3s) - after we check/check on flop/turn and villian is making pretty huge bet
(2/3pot) how we percive his range and how he percive ours when we xb twice? i think our
range is going be focused a lot on aq ak maybe some 55 77 88 a3s a6s (if we have this on
our oppening range all the time from utg) but i think we more often cbet this kind of flop
with pockets more often then xb twice there so our range should be pretty capped in
villian eyes and he can make decision to bet huge turn/river and focus us to fold our AQ
AK and weak equity hands like a3 a6 55 on a lot of rivers. When our reggish villian (i
think he is reg) see our line and make 2/3bet turn i dont think so there is much value in
his range and i see a lot of misses like kq at fd's that hit turn now, with plan to bet
bet twice if he started huge on turn. With more value hands i think he would go smaller
when he see our range pretty  weakish/middle value there. So when we xflop, x/c turn i
think we should also x/c river on such a blank card becouse if we call turn once and we
don't call riv on such a blank when our villian have very often in plan to bet bet all air
now its pretty much burning money to call turn, fold riv i think most optimal line would
be fold turn now or check call turn, check/ call riv what do you think?

35:09 (A5s) - shove shoves autoprofit obvious, but i think a bit more optimal move could be 3b/c btn and 3b/f to BB reshove there, what do you think?