omgalbertojoao

Really like the format of the video like first pool data and then solver work also the nuggets you leave on how to get better.

As a suggetion, I really like SB v BB formation always find those interesting or like another thresholds video with pool data where you give youre thoughts on how strategy start to shift from solver. Hope this sparks some idea :D thanks

8:00 Would you have a raise range versus the lead? Was thinking we just want to call all our range here LJ and BTN have a big freq of sets id say plus big draws and we miss 55 and some 99

After IP raises what you think of just clicking it back? get called by Tx and draws. What about like QQ that needs more protection. Would you say if we get jammed we would be indiferent from calling/folding?

what you think about turn leading range small as played after Raise call? feels like a spot where IP will check back a lot our range and we have more EQ.

19,44: When you think about if IP will overstab how you think about this in game? You go like whats IP highest Categories of hands and then think about how he plays does categories. So this case whats he doing with Ahigh, Weak pairs and top pair? Ask this cause if I get an unfamiliar spot with brain fog hard to get to get a conclusion without timing out. maybe you have a tip :D On the fly think id just high freq medium bet this board we have AJo,KJo that IP does not have.

36:19 Wont a lead overperform on the turn versus a rec? they will have way more fd,T and 8x that cbet an will call a lead but will just check back if we check.

This was a big post :P thanks for making vidos here on Run in once I really like them but not too sad if you go cause if follow you on youtube and twitter:P

18:50 What factors drive this 10% bet? I think its way to get more EV from like the hands we have an Asymmetrie on so like for example QQ on the B10 and then call line and like AA the b10 IP raises line. There will be other factors but like being OOP on A high board that drive bet size down but I always think as way to get more EV from like TT-KK. Guess my question is my thought process correct lol

On the last hand why does like T87fd theres no B100 but if we look up T96fd or T97fd theres a big size being used by solver. Cause IP has alot more 9x ? then 8x on T87?

I like this format bit better if we get too always see the hole cards but we get your take on the hands plus we see how the best in the world play. fun video :)

Maybe not the most clear example ^^ I think its cause we have a lot like middle pair and slighty better hand then middle pair and IP has alot of weak pair and non made hands that connected to the boards so its a way to get value with this middle part of our range. Not sure tho :D Also, similar to mono board I think connected high boards like KQTr also prefer to go for this small B10 bets. Bit of nitch question thanks :D

its mainly like Ahigh board and some Kh boards where we have alot of middle strenght hands example would be BB v BTN AT9. My question is why does solver perfer this B10 here. whats the why behind it. Quality of the image is so bad but the 20% is B10

Have seen that theres a couple of board were we split in simple way for a big and small size but solver prefers just to bet really small like B10. Is this something you do/did? As you where speaking of working with more sizings. Can you share you thoughts why this is happening? I Think this 10% bets occur cause from what I have figured a conjunction of mostly being in Ahigh board, with alot of turn that can be good for IP and where we have a lot middle strenght hands are still have good most of the time like hands with 45-65EQ. Example like AT9fd BB v BTN. ( Also see this 3bet pots IP like AJ6 fd BTNvCO but where no big size is used just a split beetween 2 small sizes)

Maybe this Q is a bit off topic. Liked the video thanks. :)

On the A7, in practice think we might be able to bet more then solver assuming people will play value a bit more agressive on the flop and turn raises for IP are a bit hard to find. Also was playing with some sizes if we give SB a bigger X raise B75 creates a range with like 99 and A7 unblocking the backdoor flushdraws for value and bluffs and plays like 2 street game with this hands. Does not feel too hard to implement.

23:28

J turn kind of a blank?Was expecting a higher bet %. IP miss cbet a lot of Jx hands and some are filter out when we X raise with no bckdoor fd and its the J of diamonds which also reduce some Jx combos that get to the turn for IP. Turn bet think block is prefer size cause we would want continue to bet like a 7x hand, 88,99.Small bet think fits more hands.

34,38:

On this K high boards think we manily want to X raise bigger then B35 we basicly just raising KQ+ for value. When raising the Weaker Kx hands is a bit confusing but seams that in Rainbow board we prefer to raise with bckdoor flush draw but on a Fd board is other way around cause get more calls from hands like Td9d and bottom pair with the backdoor fd Td3d,9d3d3.

Blind battle is always interesting :D

3:43 KdTh
Was not expecting the turn lead to be a thing just feel weird cause we bet most of our good hands on the flop and dont have the 94s/93s the IP has so we get to the turn with more weak 9x and less fullhouses? River think we give up cause there highest category of hands are like 9 low kicker A low kicker for IP

5:31 3d3c
Versus human with 3s think we can get away with it looking on how much IP need to raise in this nod? An 3s does not block the auto fold blocking some calls. Just feels like a spot where we just need to bet alot more then a solver.

15.32 Ks9d
Solver is expecting to get raised alot versus the small size so think the OB is better in practice.

SB v BB is really interesting to me ^^. This 9x boards think people bet way too much is that why you X range to open them up to X raises more often?

Zenith has high rake sims

The fact that there are so many rivers that will change the nuts and Villain is OOP on a deep SPR I thought it might bring the bet size down

On the limp call hand with KTs ( 9:27) when you face the small bet on the turn you say its not a great play why is that?

Huge Fan of your videos thanks

On hand 2 I meant flop 3bet (Timestamp: 8:56) thanks for the response!

Cool video made me want to watch more of your videos.

Have some questions,

On the #2 HAND 3BET BB vs HJ 2c Qd 3h,

I was thinking maybe versus the half pot size IP will have more raises cause we can fold more so we don't need to protect call range as much but looking at GTO WIZARD nothing really changes. But after you showed that 40% 3bet range for OOP think maybe we can deviate here is it something you would think about or do? Or think your opponents are capable off?

On the #3 Hand SB vs HJ flop is As 8h 4s

Why solver IP is rasing so much? I was looking at Equity Graph IP only has advantage on the bottom of the graph and OOP is 54% favorite using my ranges. Is cause it wants to deny equity from those Broadway hands that fold versus a raise and make most under pairs to A indifferent?

Thanks for content!!!

The raising turns always feels to me like "improvisation" cause really hard to know that IP is over betting and what kind of bluffs frequencies.

Referring Qing Yang on his video Double Barrels bluffs - SRP - He talks about how BTN bluff selection will influence our raise range being that if its to equity driven we would raise more or if its more "junk" we would call more.

Slide from Qing Yang Video

That said, I would think population overbet will be more equity driven in general so we can get away with raising more on the turn. I don't know just feels like raising turns is a bit of guess work to me probably better to just don't think about this exploitative and just model response as the solver. Any thoughts about this?!

I Like this type of video also the middle pair one that you focus on a specific "thing" has trying to think about a subject suggest and thought about BvB SRP Xraise Range Construction ( big solves so focus on X range for SB would be cool :D)

Thanks for the content!

Cool video this has interesting open my appetite made me look up other situations. Now think it would be interesting to see a follow up for this in 3bet pots would be interesting to see how you think about them and how you are thinking about exploits.

Thanks for the content.

Nice breakdown Iam playing versus this 10% bet size more. But you did not cover the spots where I usually see them that is BB or SB versus late position 3bet pots usually Ax boards as cbet on the flop and turn double barrels. Think its a combination of the bullet points you showed at the end.

Anyway nice to get some info about it especially the river lead I though was very interesting

Just finish the Becoming a Boss series pretty entertaining to watch.

I would like to request a PIO overview of CBET spots where solver uses really big sizes and how he splits between various sizes on this flops and how to defend versus that or maybe some turn and river overview also. This would be more of an "abstract thing" to get like a bigger picture about how solver would "think" about it given more flop size options. Think that would be very interesting so see and listen to your thoughts

In practice would be very hard to apply but think the Big overview would make that we would be able to adapt better versus different players types that are more forgiving when we make a mistake.

Think I just requested a 10 part series :P

Thanks for the content.

Cool stuff bonus for the "7high and a dream" comment :D Have some work to do here on these spots gonna re-watch this quite a bit of content

Also found your YouTube Channel some nice stuff there also gonna post it here if someone wants to look it up https://www.youtube.com/c/LessIsMore99

Always like your videos.

On the Kh6d4s was a bit confused cause my sims have diferent outputs think cause I bet 25% or X the flop so QT dosent have much fold equity with a Q and a T we also blocks fold range so its X at a high frequency on the flop. On the turn, think turn like more 25% then big bet as an exploit but on my sims also a high frequency X on the turn that is indifferent when X to call or fold.

Really nice that protocol with the solver I will try to implement that more in my game.

Nice Video, I prefer when coach plays full length of the hand nice to get there insight on the later streets.

9:32, On the As8h5s, so for for what I have notice is when we are IP on Ah boards and BB has a high% X range like on this case we are stabbing for the smaller size mostly. Think we will have more hands that want to stab and fold out like some 2 over with clubs hands also his X range is more protected and will get X raised more often.

11:52, think AK with the Ah will be the one that is checked more often cause it gets called less frequently by dominated hands (AhQh,AhJh,Ah4h). Also when we X think it a bit more likely we see a turn cause IP will stab more with the backdoor equity.

I can answer this one :D Great Country of the Netherlands

I was re watching and had couple more doubts,

On the first hand AT you talk about the turn. Why do we bet so much on the 9c, cause IP flop 3bet range? Gives BB more 99 and trips combos on the turn when BB just calls turn. Would you say that population will not 3bet flop as much so 9x is worst then on the sim?

On the 98s hand, I was thinking that we will not raise spades cause we have some added equity cause of the backdoor so solver prefers not to raise cause of potentially raise folding? Does this make sense to you or you think this is faulty thought process

Thanks!

On the A3s hand I think I would default for X range on the flop 5 way our bet bigger if targeting a specific player. Also if players in the middle are betting too much think the EV of X raising would go up.

On the river, think his value range is so narrow think he can over bluff here on the river. If he can turn a pair or flushdraw don't see how we can fold. 99 is such a discounted hand in my head cause probably squeeze pre sometimes calls flop only with heart probably raise turn sometimes river less then one combo I would think.

Great video

On the K45, do you think maybe villain just solved the tree for less sizes on the flop picking only a small one cause think then its a high frequency Cbet.

Any BvB spot is hard because of the wide range. But I have a feel that this one is where solver inputs although always valuable are the less important in the sense that everyone plays differently. Just 3bet as BB some people play it very polar and other more of depolar strategy.
For what I have seen from other players seams that this spot plays more similar to a BTN vs BB SRP.

I like this type of video you cant miss with this ones.

Think good follow up video from Qing Yang
https://www.runitonce.com/poker-training/videos/qing-yang-pro-poker-nlhe/

30 min with QTs, you talk about villain raise size should be bigger. I think that a small raise size also make sense and we could do it a high frequency for protection and thin value and he can X back turns to realize our equity with over cards cause I don't think people are reraising as a bluff the flop or jamming an 9x hand (TT plus are mostly 4bet pre flop I would think) . Does this make sense to you?

Have binged your videos think they are really good with the material you give and the fact you give follow up videos on the various subjects. Don't have nothing to add on the subject just "pad on the back keep on the good work" comment :P thanks.

Nice video good insight into a bit more complicated strategy then mine I try to simplicity to one turn bet size.

On the 665 think dynamic at low stakes will be a bit diferent where BTN will cbet a lot more often then a solver I think so now BB need to X raise at a higher frequency so more 6x go into that range.

On the AA9K example you show makes intuitively sense to have an OB but I am being to rigid when choosing a bet size and going for the "default strategy". Probably a confidence problem also and choosing to go with the "safety" of what you see on the solves.