nittyoldman

how dare you say "hello everybody", if it ain't broke don't fix it!

allowing click back and all-in facing the IP min raise implies there would be some click back/fold range for oop, which given that he would be getting 4:1 on a call at that point, oop would only need 20%eq to call...I dont think even in solverworld there would be some oop range that benefits from bet/click3b/fold as opposed to just giving the option of bet/3bjam...though dpsd05 appears to have looked into it, so maybe its a thing

I prefer the more theoretical/monker heavy vids, preferably those that dive into 1 spot or a collection of similar spots .

very nice

I would like to see you run quickly through a few examples using vision with a filter involved, for example:
say we are deciding where ip's cbet threshold is for AA,KK hands on T88ss, just maybe spend a few minutes on the buckets of hands that appear most frequently in ip range

I don't believe the idea of -bet less often into polar villain range-
I think it is more true to -bet smaller sizing into polar range-

Agree, would like to see advanced level solver methodology

I'd love to see you focus on HUPLO. I've actually been playing quite a bit HU 1/2 recently. I am not sure if we get more value out of watching you play vs a random guy or drilling spots in vision. I think it would be really interesting to do a series on unconventional (or "less frequent than solverworld") lines, such as xc flop, lead turn, and I'm sure vision or monker would give us great insight into ideas for high frequency hands to put into these actions.

clairvoyant solver block/calls some amount so this point is not really a concern

I prefer to watch you browse monker, also prefer deeper cash discussion over mtt

Hey Richard Gryko
29:00 In your Th turn sim, why is oop xr AK:Ah!hh here vs the IP b100? This makes me think ip b100 a bunch of sets, but then you later say ip b100 ott shouldnt have sets...it seems like the perfect 2street bluffcatching hand as long as there is no need to deny equity to sets
43:00 why is sb losing less than bb in left sim (as expected) and the reverse is happening in the right sim (unexpected)?

is there some advantage to using autohotkey if I am already comfortable running scripts in monker? I am just finding it hard to imagine it being worth my time to learn how to use this thing if I can just create the script myself...

New to this...I want to practice cbetting sb v btn in 3b pots but every time I think I set it up correctly for some reason it does the SB action for me and then asks me to choose the BTN action. I want to be quizzed on the SB action, why is this happening? I have everything unchecked except "none" in flop is checked...I thought that would make it so that no postflop action has been taken.

7:10 JT72 bets significantly more than JT82 and you say its because we get XR more often by Q8 than Q7, but that would lead me to believe that JT82 makes a better bet because we get XR off our (little) equity less often. I understand as you say, 8 is more showdown than 7 but I still don't understand why 7 bets more than 8 if the Q8/Q7 argument is true.

you just made me buy visions, also sent you a PM

I think the better follow up is IP response to lead, I'd much rather see this than OOP turn strategy because population (and most of us) will be responding incorrectly to leads and the turn equilibrium is obviously heavily influenced by IP flop continue range being correct

love it more plz

Hey Sergey! I would like to use my vote to see more hand history review from you when you are 50bb deep. Not many video creators are mastering this stack depth and you are very good at it and also good at explaining. I am a little sad to see you have not been making new videos since march. Are you still making more in future? Sergey Nesterenko

51:07 at what stack depth do you start opening less than pot? I'm a bit surprised to see the 3.5x open here when the bb is 55bb deep

Sauce live play PLO500z

25:30 Although, as stated in the video, you think he should have folded flop, if you would have arrived to the turn in the way sb did, do you think his hand makes a lot of sense to lead? He seems to have quite a bit of attractive components for it.

what is this preflop software?

in regards to the subject of a future series of videos, I would vote against bomb pots and against obscure situations like ep rfi vs mp cc. I personally cannot play on RIO and so I cannot appreciate the analysis behind preflop range discussion for bomb pots.

also I noticed quite a bit of discussion on situations that (imo) are not a big mistake either way and thus probably don't do us massive favors to spend time studying.

I know I can only speak for myself, but I don't particularly enjoy liveplay videos as much as I used to. reason being, I've realized we are at the mercy of the rng as to what situations happen to present themselves. conversely, if you were to do hh-review you could filter for related situations and keep some variables somewhat constant while isolating others to attempt to get a conclusion from the study.

i.e. 6max sb v btn 3b pots 100bb.
how do we play T52ss differently from T82ss?
how do things change if sb 3b is 5% vs 15%?
how do things change if we are 50bb 100bb 200bb eff?

I think this type of structured study is necessary to improve, and live play, though entertaining to relax and watch, is more accurately described as "pokertainment"

I'm not knocking the content within the video, just the opportunity cost we as viewers pay to watch live play from someone extremely adept at solver work

11:45 Why is Ah89K calling for so much more ev than the rest of the handclass? seems like just lack of convergence maybe

which brings up a related question...

I saw in a monker FAQ once that someone recommended clicking reset after about 5 I/N and then once more "shortly" before completion (not sure what shortly means), do you have any advice on reset button usage?

29:25 Right table what do you think about X back turn? Seems like if you had AA, this would be a spot you're not happy barreling for this large sizing. Your exact hand is obviously the immortal nuts here. I would think if there were ever a NF combo to X back it would be this one.

not sure if its just me, but in both chrome and firefox the quality is very lacking. the monker numbers are almost unreadable and very grainy.

is this all ignition?

liked the video, I would like it more if you pointed out any spots where you think pool tendency influenced your choice of action. rio has some guys doing good solver work, but I think additional value to the rio plo elite could be made if you were able to say "I think people over-fold here or I think they will respond poor to this sizing" that kind of stuff. thanks!

yes excellent format

17:15 Why do you not think lead is a good option with this hand? Is it because of positions? I would think this hand becomes a better lead vs utg than btn bc of high card/lack of low card concentrations is that why?

27:40 When you filter so precisely like this do you ever worry that the convergence is low and thus any patterns shown are rubbish?

29:30-29:45 You say "we can reasonably infer..." do you say we can infer this because of other solver observations where: a) when oop has decent draw, no top of range blockers - favor XC and b) when oop has decent draw + blocker - favor BF and c) when oop has better/nuttier draw regardless of having blocker to nut made hands - favor BC?

34:40 So, sim has larger cbet size than actual - "any tweak...increase ev of calling and not do the same thing to ev of raising", but if ALL other factors except pot size were held constant (yes I know, a large stretch what if scenario) then of course ev of xr vs 50% would appear to be a smaller win than ev of xr vs 70%. Assuming "any tweak" refers to a smaller than sim cbet size, obviously oop continues more frequently, which means an increase in both actions. Is there any heuristic that can be applied to understand how we should move hands from passive actions to aggressive ones? (i.e. moving hands from F to C, F to XR, C to XR.....and maybe some special combos move passively from XR to C idk)

While I do appreciate the MTT series as WSOP2020 is upcoming, I have to say I'm glad its over so hopefully you can get back to 6max + monker discussion. Not to take anything away from this, but your Feb24 video was exactly what I'd vote to see more of.

Does the database you use allow for an easy way to add the Ignition players to a single alias for population analysis? You may have already said it before, but what is that software? Reason I ask is that I know in HM2 its extremely tedious as you have to add them 1-by-1 and of course every anonymous player from every session has a new name created.