mx404

Very surprise holiday gift! Just going to like in the dark first and enjoy it after the holiday.

Thanks Jericho and the RIO team :D

Hey high quality content as always Nathan, thanks for the vid <3

Hey Alienslayer, nice content as always :)

Just a suggestion to the editing team - for viewing experience, it's better to blur the screen name so that you can still leave the stack size in. Cropping the bottom video makes it a bit annoying to watch.

Well explained, thanks Paul.

33:11 Last hand regarding river node

1) Could you elaborate a bit on your experience with pot size bet OTR? It's a bit blurry in the video

2) Why do you say from a structural standpoint this is one of the most over bluffed texture?

3)

"If the sizing gives me even the remote indication of bluffing
frequency here probably I'll just call"

What will be the indication or sizing tell here OTR in your opinion? Villain bets like 98% pot and I just couldn't tell from the sizing itself if it's bluff heavy :D

Thank you Tyler!!

30:20 Nice rationale on sizing to get called by one-pair.

Quick question - if I'm going thin with sets in these spots - how could you tell you’re not going to get bluff-raise out of the pot? I mean when some recs seeing tiny blocks they just can't help themselves but to bluff :D

28:45 sick sick bluff. It's very nice to use an iggy HH so that we know that he folded QQ.

But I'm actually very surprised that he didn't probe turn. I will just ruled out QQ/JJ from his range when played - and hoping to fold out 55-88 region OTR.

24:15 "This is just praying on people NOT being attentive to bet sizing to this spot"

How so? I thought this board is a nice overbet or check board from a GTO standpoint? Are you suggesting reg just not bluffing enough under these limping spots with overbets?

22:46

"hopefully minimize the amount of loss against flushes">

and instant

"I guess I lied, I forgot about this hand"

LOL best part of the video

16:20 really like the honesty saying here that you don’t have any certainty regarding the sizing in this spot.

I was also scratching my head when thinking about the sizing OTR, but I guess it seems when the turn sizing is massive - river going for pot-size seems better to catch his naked 7x region.

On a side note - do you think if we go turn smaller river bigger (say 1.5x OTT/2x OTR), we can achieve higher EV? Since we already boat up OTT, by going 1.5x, we keep some more of his flush draw so that we do get paid hard on 25% of the river, plus we allowing the fish to get to the river with wider range to bluffcatch us.

Curious on your thoughts!

13:37 - What does villain have on the 55 hand?

You emphasize many times in this video that vs High VPIP/Low PFR player, the iso raise wouldn’t make enough money with marginal hands since we don’t get the required FE often enough.

What do you think about vs High VPIP/High PFR’s rec’s (say 45/30) limp? — my general approach is to iso aggressively since i assume their limping range to be weaker since they will be aggressive with open-raise given the high PFR.

In hindsight 32:15 the UTG 33 player is this type. So TT could be a better iso?

10:40 In your opinion, is this line from BU very underbluffed (given BU is a reg) so that OOP can just only call flushes (and even maybe fold some weaker ones)?

07:00 when you say GTO doesn’t have an opinion no this spot when there's infinitely number of equilibrium, I'm just a bit confused -- how does the 3-way solver gets its result?

05:00 regarding the blocking sizing heuristics --

You talked about we don't need same sizing in wmp - and saying

"ultimately the overcard is going to be near the same value to hit as
they are in a SRP"

I don't quite understand this part -- My typical understanding of mwp sizing being small is that with 1) the shallower SPR, not big sizing is required when there's a 3bet preflop, 2) MDF is shared by two players - so both players just can't defend as wide so blocking works just well

could you elaborate your idea on overcard a bit more? Thank you!

Hey Tyler - thank you for covering this. Niche topic and very high value content. To be honest I much prefer this kind of content vs the PokerGo commentary all day every day :)

Nice review format Horse - loving seeing your reaction with face cam on

15:34 I just laughed out loud when Hellmuth's face coming up :D

Thanks for the vid :)

Thanks for the review Dhruv, also fun to have the facecam on :)

Really nice format and I can see you having lots of fun making this as well Sam :D

Thanks for the vid, kudos!

It's more of a human aspect of trying to win the hand that causes people to over bluff in these spots.

Nice nice, very helpful! I think you mentioned this in the video as well but when you put the context together here - I feel that I really understand this idea a bit deeper, thanks for the very detailed response Simon!

Simon Draper
p.s. - I left a suggestion and another question in the above comment, you might have just overlooked those, appreciated if you can take and look and answer :)

Cheers mate!

Hey nice review Emty, more please :)

I think you are the only RIO coach that covers 4BP this extensively!

Thanks Francesco, those spots are tricky less happened and it's always good to being guided through.

hey Mathias - loved the pace of your drilling. Thanks for the vid :)

Hey Nuno, love the format. Enjoy you distilling higher level takeaways out of the hands reviewed!

Thanks for the vid :)

Yeah it makes a lot of sense :D really individual/spot dependent case

Luke Johnson

other times this may flip, It's very subjective

Haha it is subjective from your description. :D

In your opinion then, what's the best way to observe/categorize how the opponent scroll for bluff or value? Thanks Luke!

thejericho2

Thanks for the detailed response :) Very helpful <3

32:05

you mentioned the tendency of people not 3betting enough on the table (I think it’s somewhat prevalent in today’s live game). In your opinion, what’s the best adjustment we can do to take advantage of that?

Playing more aggressive pre when IP? can we VPIP more? Being aggressive OTF since their ranges are wider?

24:30
Interesting take on bet sizing with “scroll bet” concept!

So in online context, would you say when the sizing looks more “artificial”, it's more likely to be value rather than bluff?

Also the same hand with 973r — curious if QQ checks the flop and it goes checking thru, how would you choose the bet sizing on the turn? HU I think overbet makes most sense for a brick turn, but I’m not so sure on a multi-way spot what’s the reasonable sizing to use here?