muzmov

Nice video. I would like you to talk more about the difference between two limits in the next part.

Hey Daniel. I think you can't say that it's better to bet bigger with overpairs based on this tree. You put 100% equity checkdown when opponent call your smaller bet, but actually you will realize way more equity with overpairs (something like 130% I would say). Also opponent's raise or fold strategy vs the bigger bet probably increases your EV with overpairs compared to strategy with calls.

Hey Daniel. I'm really looking forward to next parts of your "Betting: How Many Streets, Which Streets?" series. The first part though was pretty simple. I think a lot of elite members are familiar with that concept from Janda's book. Thats why there were not a lot of likes and comments. In next parts I hope to see ideas that can help us to decide how we want to play hands that worth 1-2 streets of value in certain spots.

What do you think optimal UTG ranges should look like? I made a definition in notecaddy, ran it on my zoom500 database and got the average fold to 3bet UTG vs CO 41%. This is 95-110bb deep but includes occasional spots with weaker players and small 3bets. So ~45% would be fair assumption. And I think it's pretty close to optimal. So my point is that GTO 3betting range should be linear here. Unfortunately I can't strictly prove this. What do you think about it?

Hey Daniel. You said that you would 3bet 8Ts CO vs UTG. So I assume you use depolarised 3betting range here. And why do you think you can profitably 3bet a hand that is not a profitable call if your opponent is not overfolding vs 3bets?

I've made a quick analysis of this spot in crev. I assumed that UTG opens 16% 4bets 3% and calls 4.5%. It gives us 55% fold to 3bet which I think is on the higher side. If you 3bet from the CO you will get 4bet from BU, SB an BB like 3% from each position which is 9% combined. I also assumed that you never call a 4bet with 8Ts and you realize 120% equity when your 3bet is called (do you think you can realize more?). As a result the EV of 3bet with 8Ts is -0.4bb. And it doesn't take into account spots when you 3bet gets cold called which lowers your EV in my opinion.

Is it supposed to be left aligned and a lot of empty space on the right? I find it pretty uncomfortable on a 27" monitor.

Hi, Daniel. I would like to see a video about implementing this concept in more practical spots. So far it seems pretty simple if we only have hands which want to bet for protection and our opponent have polarised range. But what happens if both ranges are merged and we have strong value hands, hands which needs protection and pure bluffs? Should we use multiple betsizes? How should we balance our ranges? How can our opponent adjust to this protection betting?

By the way here is very good post about 200nl http://www.runitonce.com/nlhe/200z-writeup-my-top-10/

There are usually 10-20 weak players per 100 entries at 200nl zoom. Regs are not very strong. I would say their main leak is that they don't understand board textures good enough. So if you work with CREV or Flopzilla a lot you will probably exploit them pretty easily. I personally don't play 100nl but my friend does. I think if you have 4-5bb/100 winrate at 100nl, you will have 2-3bb/100 at 200nl. Good luck!

About that 8T on A85 board. What do you think about betsizing with our whole range in that spot? Isn't it better to bet 1/3 pot with 5x and better and some bluffs? Or maybe is it better to use 2 betsizings on the flop? I would like to see your whole range analysis in CREV in this spot.

Nice video. But can you do something with stars sounds? It's too loud and quite annoying

Can you compare nl400 rush to nl500 zoom? What do you think is more profitable to play?

Looks like you check back a lot as PFR. I would like to see a video about checking back. You can pick up some hands and talk about what ranges you bet and check and why. Also it would be nice to see some CREV analysis on those spots if you are familiar with this software.

We lose .75bbs, but we get 1.5bbs dead money from blinds. And also we have position.

77 have 52% equity against this 15% range - 22+,ATs+,A5s-A2s,KTs+,QTs+,JTs,T9s,98s,87s,76s,65s,AJo+,KQo.

So it is not obvious fold to me. If you have made database analysis on this spot can you please share some numbers? 

What do you think about calling suited broadways and suited connectors in this spot?

28:16 4th table. What hands would you squeeze here and what hands would you call? Why do you prefer to call ATo and not to squeeze when reg opens and fish calls?