musaire

Wow! I wish my brain could do that postflop equilibrium live. With all the colors.
More of this please! Yes, it better be thorough than concise!

He won't call a CR with 53s. If he would he's so bad you can beat him anyway you want.

In the first hand, I don't think Q5o is a correct get-in by the BB.

The speed is okay. We can always push the 1.5x speed button, just make it 1.5x longer video.
Kidding. It was 100% perfect!

(Your articulation is good for listening with 3x speed but I like to think things through slowly.)

Wow! Amazing ability to squeeze this much information into a video while playing live and every sentence being equally relevant (bot-like selection of importance of things and using right amount of time everywhere). It was like an advanced bot from the future analyzing its own play, very professional. Respect, and thanks!

Thank you Akira! :) The series did help me understand more, especially the postflop spots I might be making mistakes in.

Interesting and fun to watch. Those jams. :D Thanks for the video!

I think the analysis was deep enough. Everything essential was said.

Not sure Owen is okay with it, hope he is, but here is some Owen's hud I once downloaded somewhere at the link below his video (haven't tried using it, seems interesting indeed), in case you didn't find it yourself already - Owen HUD

Seen you at the table, fellow baltic grinder. gl!

I agree with it.
And, since HRC is for preflop calculations where we have short stacks with low win rate (I'm playing lots of turbo SNG's as well) the FGS method seems the best in lots of spots. Not sure how much difference it makes compared to other methods, haven't compared much, but maybe at final tables with a short stack it does.

I opened the software to confirm and you are right! :) lol Thanks!
I have always used the FGS (intentionally for more real world accuracy) never knowing or thinking about it too much that it gives the %. It has been hard to notice because when playing turbo SNG's there is always roughly 100BB (just like a 100%) on the table starting from the middle of the game. :D
Wow, I did learn something new today. Hard to achieve lately. Though I never payd too much attention to by how much +EV the numbers are, any +EV was good to take notice of.

Yes:), I'd say the same about the HRC and a possibility to edit ranges and I'd cold4bet-shove 55 without much thinking in most cases as well.

When using payout structure 'the first wins it all' (cEV) I think it can't give you the result in anything else than in BB only. When using a different payout structure, yes, it gives you the result as a percentage of the total money still in play at the table. Or at least I have always thought so.

Yeah, I personally Iike this format the most. Looking forward to maybe another higher stakes mtt analysis as well of this kind, maybe later, sometimes. You are talking pretty fast and this way are able to cram all the essential information into it there is for every hand while remaining clearly understandable.
No comments on the hands. I'd play the same.

The play is perfect.
Hoping to meet you in the sunday mil finals next year!

The best video so far!
Sam's questions were very good (your answers too). Just the ones I'd ask in my mind.

At 31:10 with AA what do you think of actually not shoving vs the opener who doesn't seem to understand stack sizes and what stacks can or cannot 3bet-non-allin and do that vs what stacks? What do you think of going very non-standard and 3betting small vs this kind of player and what do you think how would he react to that?

Thanks for the video. Unlucky.
Although the spots were not too complicated, for me it is actually hard to follow you playing 8 tables and think it all perfectly through looking at all the numbers at the tables at the same time. :D So I think it might be pretty hard to play 100% perfectly while talking and making a video like this. I think, next time, it is okay to make a live session video with 4-5 tables only and go a bit deeper explaining, maybe, if it suits you. (I actually prefer after the game hand analysis videos more anyway. I like quality over quantity. :P)
It is easier to follow your live play than many other's still because you name almost all your hands and tables. :)

Enjoyed the video!

One spot caught my eye. At 19:20, playing Ad4d, top left table. Isn't it okay if we haven't got the fold equity against the BB? Isn't it okay to open and call the BB with a hand that does well vs 4BB stack (doesn't it?), at the same time our hand looks stronger opening vs that short so our fold equity vs other players is bigger as well?
Though, then we'd have to call the 7BB-stack on the button too, I think, although our hand looks stong and button's range would be stonger for that matter. But the A4s looks too good.:/

At 47:30 KQo, I think it is too break-evenish to call there, might still be a good fold :), too risky for 20BB not knowing the exact opponent's range and not much pot odds. I think calling the 3bet-shove from BB at 50:20 with QJs is like 10x better spot, good odds and does well vs. the range and not many BB's to call.

I like the videos. :)

+1000 000

lol @ 22:10 :D

Perfection

Yes, good video! Thorough enough.

I'd at least quadruple the voice track bitrate only. Would be much more pleasant to listen to and quicker to understand for non-English speakers.