moosedeer17

When motivation is low to study, the extra effort put into graphics and visuals really combats the "dryness" of 99% of videos here. (not to say those videos aren't great as well), but a big thank you to Amy for making all of these visuals that help me stay focused when my mind (so often) is drifting.

Hi Mark, I agree this video is amazing. Would it be possible to share the excel file please?

Seconded, I really appreciate all the work that must go into these videos to create such detailed reports. I can imagine this takes a lot more time than a HH review. Thanks for this series of videos. (The little PIO tutorial for scripting is appreciated also)

i believe on monotone boards villains range is going to be more polarized than on rainbow boards. eg. having a flush or air. big bets vs a polarized range don't perform too well.

Hi, a bit late to the party here but I have a question about @23:00, adjustment #2 to insufficient check raise. You say the vulnerable hands start to benefit more as a protection bet when we are facing an insufficient check raise. Do we still not want to include the broadway-broadway hands in this range that are favoring checking on the 776 board (around 9:56). For example the KQs and KJs that are favoring checking in the PIO sim, vs an insufficient checkraise frequency, would those be suitable candidates to include in our increased betting frequency as our adjustment, or do they still benefit more from hitting one of our pair outs on the turn when it goes x/x?

hey G G,

mark explains somewhere in the series, but PIO generates this flop subset to mimic all the possible flops. He gets it from PIO

Hey chaps,

nice video again.

@34:20 you go for a bet 30% on the river. is this sizing more of an exploit? ive been using more 1/2pot-overbet sizings on the river from my limited work with solvers. if it is, what factors let us stray from theory here? and if it is not, what hands should we look to be filling out this range with?

thamls

hi @11:18,

you minraise into a 10bb stack in the BB. ive seen from other instructors that they are using a slightly larger raise sizing to give worse odds to BB to defend, as they can defend so frequently (being able to realize their equity so shortstacked).

what should we consider when deciding opening sizes into a short stacked BB because I've heard conflicting things here, and both thought processes make sense?

wow thanks for being so thorough with your answer man.

thank you so much for the quick reply.

i know this might be out of the scope of the video, but if we were to x-raise more as an exploit, would we draw this extra frequency from raising more often with hands that we do x-raise with or by x-raising some hands that were not x-raises before?

Hi Mark,
at around 36:00, you show the flop 3bet range for IP, 3betting around 15% of the time. if we think population or specific villain tendency is to not get anywhere close to this 15% frequency, would it be correct for OOP to increase their flop x raise % as an exploit?

a great video, thanks.

Hi thanks for the video.

first hand: can we just check 100% of the time here and not give up much EV?

I enjoyed the analysis but maybe if we should be checking 100% it would be nice to first go through that tree (if only briefly) before going through the tree that happened in-game so we could compare the two trees.

hey thanks for the video.

@15:36
you say this board is a big sizing board. With TT here (flopped set) are you mixing small bet and check? if, so which hands are perfect candidates for the lower frequency small bet?

i guess better to ask if you are still adding a small sizing on this board at a low frequency or using only big bet or check?

thanks again.

makes total sense what you did in-game. When I hear range Cbet i just think of a CBet with the entire range, but what you did makes complete sense, was just a matter of semantics. thanks for the quick reply chaps and hope to see more from you soon.

hey chaps
I really enjoyed the vid thank you. I was just confused about one part @28:21 you say you go for a range cbet after saying you think you can bet this board at a decent frequency. What exactly do you mean by range cbet if not cbet your entire range?
other than that one spot you were really clear in your thought process thanks again.

@22:17, KK

from what part of our range do we take this line as a bluff?

Not to say that a 100bb spot would be great, but I think the 100bb spot (like Krzyszstof Slaski's (sic) recent 3bet series), is covered way more often on RIO than an even shallower SPR

I think a 30bb spot, SB 3bet vs CO at 2.5 SPR, or BTN 3bet vs CO at 2.5 SPR would be more valuable spots to cover before a 100bb spot.

@10:35 you raise 98o over an open from the SB. The sizing you use is 2.5x and is a bit smaller than the 3x im usually using in this spot. Is this sizing smaller than a normal sizing just due to the stacks being smaller? The SB villain has about 30bbs, at this depth is 2.5x ok for a 3bet? at what threshold would we start using a larger sizing over the open?

Hi Krzysztof,

I'm curious about how the strategy changes if the turn pairs the board. I don't mean to ask you to run the sim all over again but what general trends should we assume in strategy if the turn is a 2 that pairs the board or an 8 that pairs the board?

Since the 2 is still pretty underrepresented in both ranges, maybe a board like Jh9h5x turn 5x
or turn 9x would be a better question. Would OOP have a leading range? Would IP not utilize the 1.5x overbet as often?

I have the same question for your 3bet vid on board-changing turns as well.

thanks love the vids.

hey yoh,
thanks for the vid.

The AQ hand, are you never checking the flop?

Hi Krzysztof,

great video, thank you.

@24:51 you say I think what end's up happening here is we bet at a very high frequency of our hands that dont have showdown value due to all the value combos we have....

Does this mean with the range we theoretically get to in this spot (with your range assumptions up to this point in the hand being constant), we should be shoving (or betting small) with pretty much our entire range due to there being too many value combos and not enough bluffs? or does this mean there are still some give ups? If there are still some giveups could you give some info on how we can find the best combos to give up with?

thanks

someone more informed can correct me if im wrong but i think between those 3 specific holdings, the difference in EV is relatively unimportant. he could change K7o to Q8o and it wouldnt change the overall EV of the range that much.

Hi Chris,
@ 26:44 you say youre going to mix and you rolled a call. I assume you're mixing between calling and 3b, what % mix are you going for here?

@43:20 you checkraise KK for value. What are your bluffs in this spot?
thanks

he means he c-bets his entire range for that size.

timestamp 5:40,

if you know villian is not going to fold Tx or 6x to this ~75% cbet, how should we change our strategy on this flop?

how do you think tastyterps should have played his AQss vs ur BB QTo? (min 29:00)

Montreal?

Hi, thanks for your videos. @0:47, what factors to consider when choosing between opening J7ss OTB or limping OTB?

What are your thoughts on ShippityShip defending 3bet OOP with A7cc at his stack size of 37bb?