Satoshi Nakamoto

hey I am struggling with this spot.

As you can see, in terms of GTO, BB 3bet w polarized range on this spot and BB also 4Bet aggressively with polarized one.
Let's assume practically on this spot. SB is rec. And his RFI range is kinda same with reg's one. But SB would defend more passively and 4Bet less with linear range, how BB range would change?

Less 4Bet from SB -> BB would 3Bet much linearly because BB could see flop IP more often?
More linearly 4Bet from SB -> BB wider defense vs 4Bet? Some JJ/even QQ would flat? It depends on how linear SB's range is, tho.

If anyone has a preflop solver, I would appreciate it if you could nodelock this spot and analyze it.

All comments are welcome.

Thanks :)

Villain is like 20/15/3B:2.5(2/79) Fto3B: 50 SB RFI:44 over 250hands.
I saw him CC with marginal in SB so I could say he is kinda weak/passive rec?

flop: I use half pot CB/Check on this flop.
turn: 5 is bit scary but he could have tons of 2over/st8 draw. Half bet would be fine.
river: 2 is totally blank. With K9, triple could be thin in hindsight because he could flat w TT/JJ, given his low 3B stats(he would also 4B way less here BVB)
His xr jam looks too strong. He could have some full house/straight/trips. I don't think he xr w over pair. And its probably difficult to find enough bluffs... Blocking 9 looks fine but its not enough against his value-heavy xr range.

How do you guys feel with my b-b-b line and fold vs xr otr? Check back OTT also seems to be fine given his relatively strong flat range pre.
Any opinion would be appreciated.

Thanks

Villain is like 57/39/17, Fto3Bet 0/5 over 60samples.

preflop : Maybe should be much bigger.
flop : range bet w 30%. But cb-size could be bigger exploitatively, vs this player.
turn : Faced halfish donk then hero 33% raise and flat his min 3bet. I thought that his xc-donk half range is mostly marginal hands like naked FD/pair + SD type hands. Yes he could have some straight sometimes for sure. So I chose that small raise size vs his donk. Big raise size would isolate his strong combos overly.

Questions:
1. What do you think about my assumption, "xc-donk half" line is full of marginals.
2. My play was just based on six-sense at the time. Do you have any MDA-based data on this spot?

Thanks :)

Villain looks tighter/regish player like 19/16/11 over 150 samples.

flop : check/check. Check back from villain on AAJ is def suspicious in hindsight.
turn : 60ish prove from her with full house. Think this size is a mistake. I should target his random trips OTT.
river : 75 bet and faced 75% raise from villain. Hero's full house was already kinda bluff catcher at this point. But I no-brainer called just because its full-house lol. Sigh.

What is villain's raise range?
In theory, villain would have no choice but cbetting range OTF. But he did not cbet OTF.
Some random A3s,A8s, nut Flush? Slowplayed AJ? I don't think he would have 33 OTR.
He could have some random value combos such as better full houses than mine but don't think he could found some random bluff with this size.
Yeah feel like its enough to defend with just AJ/A8/A3.

My question is;
1. If prove ott, which sizing could be better?
2. After proving ott with your size, which size do you choose or not betting? And the reasoning?
3. Do you guys have any exploitative assumption about his check back range?

Think I choose 75size OTT > pot-120 overbet OTR line, then fold vs big raise.
After calling hero's 75 prove, his range is relatively strong. So targeting his random trips/flush.

Thanks :)

Villain looks regish player like 23/19/7.4 over 200samples.
flop : T/low/low board. Would bet widely with half size.
turn : kinda bad card for OOP. AdQh would be generally in check range bc of blocking backdoor diamond OTF. Probably CB with AhQx OTT with some frequency?
river : Kh is relatively good card OOP prob. Then I chose small sizing. Its targeting his low-mid PPs. Though AdQh have blocked some Flush combos/AK/AQ, thought that small sizing could be the most profitable one vs low/mid PPs...

My questions are;
1. If you bluff w AdQh, do you choose smaller size?
2. Is there any reason to choose other sizing exploitatively?
3. Any reasons to split ranges OTR into big bet(Flush, some AK, trips) and small bet(marginal Kx, QQ, JJ, ), gto-wise/exploitatively vs reg? Tbh I don't know about this. Maybe vs fish, two bet size would be better since their strong combos could be inelastic otr.
After checking OTT, OOP would have disadvantage about Flush combos prob. So simplifying with small size would be easier/better vs reg?
4. Wait. AdQh is wrong combo for bluffing? yeah...Its blocking AdQd/AdJd float otf. Ummm feel like the river is bit bluff heavy spot.

Anyway thanks in advance :)

BTN looks regish stats with small samples though, and BB CCer is loose passive player. He is like 40/10/13 over 50samples.
4Bet was the first option that popped into my head because didn't wanna see flop multi way w JJ. But I was bit scared to do so bc of BBs stack size. He could have QQ here?

My main points are;
1. don't wanna see flop MW w JJ.
2. wanna isolate BB player if possible. He could have wide CC range here like tons of PPs, Axs, Kxs, and big Axo.
3. JJ could be not strong enough to 4bet here?

If BB were 100bb deep, do you guys have 4Bjam option here?

Ummm, feel like JJ is not strong enough here for 4Bet, as a result...
What do you guys think this spot? :)