mediacalc

Are the ranges downloadable or is it simple a quiz?

edit: Fairly interesting point: "In simulations with rake, the solver naturally assumes all other players are also rake-aware (folding when they should, cold-calling less, etc). For example, in a raked NL game the solver will open wider in earlier positions and prefer opening hands like A5o (better for blocking our opponent's 3-bet range) over hands like 65s (better for postflop play/board coverage).

If players in your game are not adjusting accordingly (i.e. too much cold calling with not enough 3-betting or 4-betting), then using no rake ranges (rfi/3bet/etc.) in practice would work better. In general, we would recommend starting with no-rake ranges to have a good baseline/fundamental strategy and then explore the differences in raked simulations to see what deviations are made when there is rake."

Question might be more fitting for the HM product forums. I know the method zinom1 recommends is real but I was never able to do it on HM2.

how's it going now metal_ouda :)

sauloCosta10 a 3b/fold strategy BTN vs UTG? Isn't BTN one of the only spots where we're able to flat?

why do you have a cut on your forehead?

Did you learn anything or have a eureka moment since this comment?

A good video that I learned a few things from. Will say that it is slightly hard to listen to with the stop-start nature of the commentary; of course I understand this is not your first language

Watching your videos in reverse order and I did not know you made Grinder's Manual. Amazing stuff

People really only solve to 1%? I was solving to ~0.2% each time. Would save me a lot of time

he left twitch?

doesnt make a difference

Hard to read comment

Nice idea to use a randomiser to actually work on spots until we improve

This HUD O_O

Not going to lie, I didn't find this video useful at all. Just a list of mostly obvious tips.

Agree with you, given everything he was saying an overpair should be a stackoff at 40bb

08:00: Folding AJ from SB vs CO 2.5x? Standard?

I agree, turn shove seems far too loose

Hate this layout on Stars, so annoying to keep track of positions

Wow, hand2note looks like a great software

I feel like for some of the questions, there are multiple correct answers. The hand with Nick with ATs seems like an example of this

I think a lot of the critiques are "we don't have enough bluffs" or "we have too many bluffs" and these should have a lower weighting given the fact that this is a microstakes video where we should play as exploitatively as possible. If villains don't have a protected checking range on a paired high card flop then I see no issue with bluffing >75% for example when checked to (until they adjust)

Thank you, just replied now!