mako27

Pretty disagree with your comment on (55)6 hand.
1) If 2 open with 2 4 6 door cards mostly it's wired pair or 3flash cards with overcards. Don't think 3betting it showing some additional strength of hand, it's already should be good enough for open with dead 2.
2) On 5th street, it's OK to check when blocking 66, it makes you having sss in door cards much more often than if not having 66 in the hole cards.
3) And when you check back 5th street you never have flash and most probably have wired pair in the hole cards and then odds are good enough for calling down.
Only negative point imo - you can realize that you are playing against 66, but it does not cost much in a limit game.

yeah, would like to see part 2

would like to see a trird part as well.

yes, please make 2nd part

I love big final tables way more than the previous 15-30 mix game content. Vote for part 2.

don't like this format. Many different RIO videos already were published as vision test driving/explanation.

great format, like it

nice video, but I'm afraid your assumptions about ranges maybe not correct. You removed all A2s A3s A4s from the button range, but they are very important on AK2 board. Many players have it in the min-raise range and then results probably would be changed significantly.

I enjoyed this one as well. was really very interesting

agree with Shakti. Nothing to learn from it.

great video. Like this format.

Hello, 5:52 - how shallow your stack should be for favoring open shove with 88 instead of min raising? 12-13bb?

video is not working for me

enjoyed the format as well

nice video

great video, so many interesting spots in this session.

fantastic check river in the last hand

Nice video. was a bit surprised you twice 4bet ATs. how often you recommend to do it? What about AJs A9s or simular hands in this spot?

I prefer live play format. Though 2 tables are better than 1.

great video, excited for next one

It seems like graphics are wrong in 2-7. people drawing wrong cards

Hello. Last hand. If we think that opponent doesn't have Q9 QQ 99, probably doesn't have Q4 Q3 etc, why we check/calling river instead of a check/raising it?

Hello. Second hand - I think the main difference between your strategy in-game and PIO was how you play Qx hands at the flop. You probably gonna call most of them and after that, you have many straights at the turn and you can lead hands like A3s. But PIO c/r AQ almost always, c/r QTs almost always, c/r QJs ~50% of the time and even sometimes c/r KQ. So, PIO does not have many Qx in check/call flop range and can't lead turn at all. What do you think about that? I think the population would mostly lead towards your strategy, not PIO.

I guess the idea of limping AQ was confusing opponents and outplay them post-flop.

and 3bet then 9bb or 9sb ?

Very interesting final table with a lot of top players. Waiting for the next part. Just 1 question: you did not say much about pokerkluka vs imluckbox JTo<88 big hand, do you like Imluckbox calling down all streets with 88 according to ICM? They probably played vs each other a lot but still, we are risking our tournament life at the final table with big pay jumps for every place with 88, do you think it's still good to call with ICM factor?

like this format of video

hello, not sure if I understand correctly, but why if we analyzing no limp strategy for btn/sb why he raises 4bb at 25bb stacks? about 15:30 timestamp

4:00 spot seems very interesting for me too. AK can be good bluff raise but is not it too strong for bluffing? what you would be calling at the river then?

great format. like it