lettu

Doesn't giving only 120% turn sizing for IP significantly hurt the bigger flop sizing? I would suspect that on the 962 suited board atleast.
Nevertheless very useful video!

Your combo is very nice for just calling the flop raise. I wouldnt look to fold on many runouts. Theres some recs where 3b is best, but without reads that he loves to raise say merged value (like QT QJ type hands) and semibluffs for that sizing, I would tend to just call.
That said I think the play is fine and would get it in happily there vs. your average rec.

I would say only spot where its important to "polarize" / 3bet some junk hands is BB v SB. Maybe BB v BTN too, especially the wider they open.

I would go bigger turn and jam this river. Even now I think I prefer just jamming, by a large margin.
Why are we creating a wideish c-c range on Jh river?

Pair this high is mandatory bet imo. Going small makes the most sense to me too.

Probably just best to buy some solutions, when it becomes relevant and valuable enough :)
Freestyle quite liberally untill then. I'm looking at pokersnowies ranges and they certainly dont seem that great, but I would be surprised if its leaking huge with them! So maybe preflop doesnt matter a huge deal, aside from bigger adjustments vs clearly weaker players..

Not sure where I should look to buy them though. Dont have paid version of pio/monker, only gto+.

I find it hard to approach the 4b defense range too. Its only few hands that are clear folds in my 3b range vs. say common 2.5x 4bet. Lots of hands that should be around 0ev calling I'm guessing.. So I would try to do a lot of calling here to 4bets being IP and having lots of playable hands, slowplay AA often and such. I think its only narrow range that likes to 5b shove here.
Its good point to look at play vs. 4bet. For better or worse, I dont think I'm overfolding (atleast much) to 4bets with this range. It would be so much easier to draw conclusions from 4b defense, if it was 5bet/fold heavy range :(

+1 sick computer setup!
Curious if he had 34s, with backdoor flushdraw on the flop? Or just a random 34 hand?

Looks good, leading flop could be an option too.

You can tighten your range, but A9o will never be even close to an open fold. That would never be the case in any realistic scenario.

Definitely cant fold, BB is a fish, so CO should get it in here fair bit lighter and you're holding middle set, so not even close.

Nh, checking river would be very suboptimal!

Open all of them.
I tend to auto open all of them except ATo for 3x, regardless of table. A5s should be an obvious open usually (hand prefers deeper stacks though), others marginal.
Preflop spots like this is not why you're doing good or bad though, its really kinda what ever in these spots imo!

I think CR here, should perform better than calling. Nh!

Super easy shove as played. Everything else is horrible.

Well played on every street.

Dont think we should consider bluffcatching river with this hand. Also I tend to think that turnplay is extremely nut heavy. I would fold this hand on the turn. I do think its good barrel and you are not gonna get raised here often.

Just triple barrel this hand vs. a fish. I might just shove river my self.
As played I'm calling, but think its kinda marginal spot, with no reads on the fish.

Yeah the stats thing can be misleading, vpip pfr converge way faster than 3b. Hes probably a nit playing a very tight style. But its extremely unlikely that he has 1% 3bet (or under 5-4%), because almost nobody does.

Clear river shove as played.

I would expect to see a 9hxh hand here a ton, maybe something like Jh5h etc. Assuming villain is not a fish. I highly doubt people bluff this spot basicly ever.
If villain is total unknown it becomes a harder fold, I guess.

I doubt c-c flop is the best play with this hand. Especially with a strategy where you have no cr range on the turn. Its bad reasoning to check just to protect your range, like said earlier. What you should always worry about is playing every hand to its highest EV.
Checking some weakest Qx on the flop seems a lot more reasonable to me than JJ. Or a strategy where you bet flop more merged with hands like AA KK QTs or smth and start check calling turn, since you cant triple those for value.

a hand like KT should be a clear valuebet for him.
If he has lots of no pair hands on the flop for c-c and or just bets a ton to win pots, this kind of hand could be a fine call. Normally just fold vs. not terrible villains.
I like the turn check.

I would always check flop. As played seems totally fine.

Calling looks perfect to me, I would be very surprised if it wasnt better than folding. Oo

Doesnt seem necessarily bad, but you're repping very thin imo. How many big clubs would you check back OTF?
I would just call here all day.
Maybe this play has merit vs. people that are overly nitty and believer types.

I would 4b pre readless.
As played calling turn.

Mostly stick to betting valuehands on the turn that can also valuebet many rivers.

Pre should be slightly +ev with fish in blinds. I dont know why people focus on pre here though.
Turn seems bad, he can have some weaker Jx and playing hands like 99, TT make a bit of sense, with the fish on the pot and for that sizing. And besides that A7 is very weak and down in your range here. Also villain could easily bet some better Ax hands, weather it is good or not, which is even worse for us.
Also I would level just a tiny bit that this is more of a thin value rather than a bluff sizing for villain.
I would need something like AK, AQ to start considering calling.