leprecholny

Very good content. I think going over practical hand examples after the fact rapid fire is the best format. I wonder if it's rare because guys don't want to give too much away.

It's a profitable overcall, I would say the main error in your thinking is classifying 67s as a reverse implied odds hand, in this kind of situation flush over flush is rarer than you making a straight and "coolering" a 1-3 players top pair or better. Whatever equity 67s has vs their ranges is improved by the post flop situation, as your hand is easy to play/deceptive/you have position etc... Granted you will sometimes have to fold a bottom or middle pair that was good, flush over flush, there are draw backs so you don't have amazing implied odds, but you do have a bit more EV than your equity would indicate.

Anyone have an idea for why the solver is more aggressive with suited hands? Regardless of hand strength... it's discussed between 12-13 minutes

Please do NOT explain your actions more in depth. Not every video producer needs to spend 5 minutes pausing the action to explain a standard spot, there's plenty of that on this site. Very often the pros and cons of a play are obvious and it's interesting what the pro ends up deciding. Love the videos that get through a lot of hands per video, this also gives players that don't play on pokerstars better insight into the metagame of the toughest cash games.

40 minutes on one $160 pot... high stakes hands was a misleading title.

10:53 is it standard to fold 88 in the sb to an utg open?