josham
0 points
CO: 461,875
BN: 303,911
SB: 906,575
BB: 613,578
UTG: 790,991
UTG+1: 700,769
MP: 922,455
UTG lost and shows a pair of Nines.
MP+1 wins 792,742
Nov. 1, 2015 | 10:45 p.m.
UTG+1: 9,888
MP+1: 80,036
MP+2: 50,002
CO: 16,159
BN: 73,671
SB: 51,846
BB: 33,090 (Hero)
UTG: 31,994
BB wins 12,540
Nov. 1, 2015 | 10:37 p.m.
MP: LG_Gangsta: 5,676
UTG+1: alexisdg8: 4,280
MP+1: cel01: 8,983
MP+2: pabritz: 8,474
CO: ManiekkkCDL: 4,927
BN: silverchaser: 1,095
SB: ddanfoong80: 15,460
BB: hoodie333: 5,413 (Hero)
Nov. 1, 2015 | 10:23 p.m.
BN: 55,231 (Hero)
SB: 164,345
BB: 150,375
UTG: 96,332
UTG+1: 262,272
MP: 113,894
June 3, 2015 | 8:19 p.m.
MP+2: 73,671 (Hero)
CO: 112,897
BN: 47,052
SB: 59,926
BB: 134,177
UTG: 113,974
UTG+1: 86,835
MP: 68,016
June 3, 2015 | 7:42 p.m.
Hey John - great video as always!
I noticed you say that you tend to open slightly bigger from the SB. I can see why you'd do this at 20-30 bb, because you disincentivise flats and probably don't change villain's 3bet jam range too much.
Do you open bigger at 30+bb? If so, what is the benefit of this? To me it seems like this would be building a pot out of position with what is going to be perceived as a fairly weak range from the SB, and with the BB getting a discount I imagine you're going to have to play post quite a bit. I know personally I tend to flat very wide in the BB bvb.
Cheers in advance
May 20, 2015 | 12:52 a.m.
Cheers guys!
May 11, 2015 | 11:13 a.m.
Other side note to add to his image - he limped a lot of buttons 3 handed, so again quite weak passive
May 8, 2015 | 11:23 a.m.
BB: 1,414,044 (Hero)
BN: 864,603
Cheers John
If you were playing against a passive fishy villain in the BB would this change? So if we assume he's very rarely going to raise cbets - I feel like we can play profitably OOP, but nevertheless we want to keep the pot small. We can fairly exploitatively construct a bet, x/c, x/f, x/r range but why would we want to make the pot bigger in this case?
I guess what I'm asking is if BB isn't going to use position to his advantage and play pretty face up - as many micro low players would - would you consider sizing smaller pre?
May 20, 2015 | 11:26 p.m.