joeyknish

Imho the AA on 32:00 is played and analyzed fairly naive. In a bounty tournament there should be less incentive to squeeze w marginal stuff once you cover him. An argument could be made though for flatting to keep BB involved. Don´t know if the added value of his bounty supercedes the loss of EV for not pushing our EQadvantage vs CO.
Postflop your argument for a raise seems faulty. Just because he is going to call worse does not mean that the EV of a raise is > EVcall.
Even if granted that he might be cbetting more or a lot more than is actually warranted our particular hand seems well suited as a call. I guess JJ could work better as raise. Would be nice to hear some argument as to why you want a raising range on this board at all.

Should you ever consider doing another similar video i suggest you give a small overview how often different handstrengths are actually present for each player on the particular boardtexture. Esspecially since you use weights for each combo.

Otherwise nice vid

I am by far no expert on Pio but i suspect that the increase in EV you talk about in min 13 is due to restrictions you impose on betsize and line-options further along the game tree.
On a related note: I can understand why you use only one betsize for further streets (technical limitiations on your PC?) but i am a little suspicious as to the validity of your results given those restrictions.
I assume this is a bigger problem the deeper the SPR is since i found PIOsolver does very little "slowplay" given those medium betsizes from villain. Actually i kind of suspect it is more viable to establish a singular betsizing for the flop and open up the possibilities on later streets. You talk about that as well but you do not implement it.

why does the screen say 2.50/5 but actually blinds are 0.50/1? seems odd...

zaza <3

@19:00 vs quite a few players it may be best to 3b/f here. Depending on sizing one faces a few peals w mostly dominated hands but hardly any 4b-bluff shoves.
@42:00 it feels like we should call 55 here. Odds are decent and BB could bluff/vbet very liberally OTR given that we look like mostly Ahigh. Given current tendencies to defend BB pretty wide I tend to cbet those boards close to 100%. Our Top-Range should be strong enough to discourage Flopraises. And 55 needs a lot protection on this board.

It seems like there are missing chunks in the vid starting with the QTs hand. It jumps midway into the hand a few times.