jeffb88

Around 27 min when you are counting the # of higher / lower flushes. I believe there are 5c2 = 10 lower flushes, and 3c1*7c1=21 higher flushes. So if your opponents range is 100%, they are over 2x as likely to show up with a higher flush than a lower flush. Given they didn't 3bet pf they likely have less of the higher flushes.

Nice video Laurens.

On the AK64dd hand you said you were making an 'exploitative' small bet on the river but I think a small bet makes more theoretical sense than a shove. Even though you are probably betting nuts or nothing here, your possible bluffs are turning 2pair/sets into a bluff with or Ad blocker (or maybe without blocker?), or you called two streets with Ad blocker to bluff river.

I don't know your BTN call of CO open range, but I would guess it has a lot more suited ace hands than hands with an un-suited ace? So unless you are bluffing non Ad hands, your ratio of value bets to bluffs will be large, so your value bet would have to be small to make your opponent indifferent.

I think if you shove your opponent has a pretty easy fold, but betting the size you did or smaller will make it much tougher for them.

Nice video, really enjoy the work in PokerJuice.

Tom, Interesting video topic thanks for making this one.

One piece of constructive criticism is your videos tend to go very long, and a lot of the time was spent reading off slides about your layout of each players strategies. It would be nicer if these were presented in an easier to read form like a table or tree if you are going to read them so you can go over it faster. The alternative is to just have people pause the video to read the strategies so you can move on to the analysis.

Either way thanks for the content.