jake schindler
3 points
w 53o at 20:04 .. did you consider betting ~40% at all? do you prefer the size you made it? his range is mostly pp and a hi ? feel like a smaller bet may be better.
May 23, 2014 | 6:04 a.m.
Overall this seems more than difficult to shed light on...if a play is close and you know its fairly marginal you could argue folding.. I just dont think many people are consciously aware of how many +BBs given certain stack sizes a play needs to be to be worth making. Would like to hear ideas on this if any.
April 16, 2014 | 12:40 a.m.
In MTTs, you can make certain range assumptions to figure out if a play is +ev and by how many BB it is +ev.. Something ive been thinking more and more about is: How +ev in terms of BB relative to stack size must a play be for it to be worth making and how to form guidelines based on your theoretical roi (the roi being from point where hand in question exists until completion of tournament).
For example... A specific play may make .09 bbs when 30bbb eff and may not be worth taking because your overall edge is too large however... if 4bb Eff a play that is +.09bb would seem more enticing.
Do any RIO pros have any insight regarding parameters/requirements a play must make in BBs relative to stack size for it to be worth taking (with something close to your theoretical ROI considered)?
April 16, 2014 | 12:35 a.m.
whats your reasoning for lying to the dude pumped about being on a video at 3:20?
are you walking in place this entire video
July 6, 2014 | 1:34 p.m.