jakenastics

Hi Psek you mentioned geometric bet sizings. What are the conditions that need to be met for geometric to be used? I've started using geometric sizings often when overbetting on lower SPR's but then I think it falls through on high SPR like 20/1 OTT. Then also I see solver sometimes using block followed by jam e.g. calling 3b IPO B/c X/B1/3 X/OB Jam. My guess is it's driven by comparative range make-up? e.g. the last example maybe we had similar equity OTT then once they just call we have a significant advantage at the top of ranges and OB, whereas if we have that equity advantage OTT we would then use geometric (unless SPR too large as equity advantage needs to scale with SPR? for geometric to be used)? If my thoughts are correct on geometric, any rules of thumb for how much equity adv we need to SPR to use geometric sizings?

Is 500nl on GG a leaderboard grind? Could you let me know what WR is like without LB's? I'm looking at moving into those games

Are you done with RIO per just on vacation? You haven't posted in a month and we are hanging here :-)

one of the most instructive videos i have seen, obviously for my level but hey, it really worked for me, excellent

I use Piosolver, so the hotness function should be the same feature. I'm curious though, do you suggest using 2 sizes for the turn as a whole, or 2 sizes per card that comes out on the turn.

Nice... thanks for clearing that up :)

Hey Henry, on 16:30 you talk about the double cold call range of villain to be "wider rather than tighter". I would have assumed it was the opposite, i.e. very condensed (though weaker than someone who single cold calls a 3bet). What type of hands would you put in his range please?

Super confused why 1-a doesn't apply on the flop. We need to make the aggresor indifferent between check and bet so we should always defend under 1-a was my understanding. Calling so often we can be exploited by Villan betting pure value?