iCeColdCash

Flopped flush draw and 2 overcards. Thought this was a pretty standard C-bet.

Very very wet board and I hit a flush. This is probably where I made a big mistake with my sizing. I bet half size pot to induce worse hands to call such as any straight draws, worse flush, one pairs etc. Maybe this deserved a full-size pot bet? I'm most likely ahead, only hands beating me area straight flush and the ace high flush. What do you think the re-raise is indication of? I figured it possibly put him on one of the trips: 66, 99, 55, 44. Other hands also include hitting the straight, but probably less likely. Also any Ace of spades with any other card. He may have also hit a lower flush such as with 10 9s, 8 7s, Q Js etc. A straight flush here is also possible for him to hold and to get more money in the pot. Would I ever fold or all-in here?

I thought that this was an obvious fold, all trips have hit their full house, ace of spades got there. It's possible I got bluffed and he only hit a straight or a worse flush, but I think this is a clear fold.

So this was my logic. It was a fairly wet board that has hit villains calling range, but if he had a ten he would most likely not lead out with it. Then again, now when I look back at this hand the lead out could have been for value/to scare away flush draws. What should my thought process be here? I figured that it would be more likely for villain to have a flush or straight draw here and I re-raisedx3 to price him out.

With such huge draw heavy board like this one should I just be giving up or am I getting enough loose calls to warrant another barrel?

Board got even wetter with that turn card. I figured that because there is probably so much that would be calling me here I may as well go for another barrel. Should I just give up here instead? The only hands beating me are 77, JJ, any one of the remaining two 10s, and 8, 9. Ruling out pocket kings or queens due to the pre-flop action. Was I right to fire another one here? I really didn't want him seeing a free card but maybe I should have checked and re-assessed on the river.

Not too sure what is happening in this hand with the check-raise. Would this be someone getting more value off a KQ or AQ type of hand? Probably even a bluff. Either way, not entirely sure if I should be calling here or re-raising again and playing as the aggressor. Also now looking back at this, maybe he was going for the flush draw and wanted to be the aggressor? What do you think?

Seems like a brick card and I didn't have position so I checked with the intention to call his raise assuming it wouldn't be too large. Should I have lead out here and gone for fold equity+value for open ended straight draw?