huplz

6max player here :) what do your open ranges look like in the first 3 positions?
and how do it change your UO bvb play 6max vs 9max?

if when we have AA we cant tie and its just 1 combo of AA 

what if when we have AA and villain can just have KK or QQ. I guess here we should bet as much as we can but allways check QQ some small % as it is money in the pot? or am a I completely wrong here?

is it any flops / stack sizes where we want to check raise everything ?

vs players that fold to much vs flop check raises do we check raise TP+ to "balance" our explo range or is it better to just keep the frequencies down and just check raise air?

Do you think A9 is a +ev call vs a river bet here? I also like to know what people think about flop line to me it is not clear what the best play is ofc dependent on the villain but even default i am not sure what best play is. Also my question is is this a spot that if everyone thinks it bad it really is bad or it is good because everyone thinks it is bad? Or did you guys allready think about that :) 

by Calling river i guess he is saying he dont Think sauce will have much 4x 3x? I do Think the Ax flushdraws will be put in to the more passiv check call line here tho.

 

Not sure what his 3bet range pre looks like btw what do you guys Think about his 3bet sizing? I dont really play Heads up 100bbs. But looking from HH standard is often ~2k here.

 

 

how about in heads up maybe more shorter stacks? vs good defenders to limp the total range we play in sb ?

reposting from part 1 huplz  So how would the math be for BvB limping we have 55% ev from a pot with 2bbs in it so 2*0.55*0.8? so 0.88bb/hand we make when we see the flop as R is 80% - the limp (as we cant win our own money) so +0.38bbs when we see the flop?If we limp and get raised we lose 0.5bb/hand if lets say we fold vs a raise 100% of the time then for limping to be 0ev bb have to raise 43%? isent BBs goal to make our weakest limp ev0    whats the definition of bb being exploitable vs limps? Even tho a 100% limp way of playing bvb make your unexplo sb strategy bigger then a unexplo 100% pfr strategy (100% of the hands you play) do you Think that the bigger hands like AK AA TT etc makes so much less that rasing still might be better?How are the players you know doing limping the hands like that vs rasing them? 

So how would the math be for BvB limping we have 50% ev from a pot with 2bbs in it so 2*0.5*0.7? so 0.7bb/hand we make when we see the flop as R is 70%.

If we limp and get raised we lose 0.5bb/hand if lets say we fold vs a raise 100% of the time

 then for limping to be 0ev bb have to raise 59%?

 

whats the definition of bb being exploitable vs limps?

 

Even tho a 100% limp way of playing bvb make your unexplo sb strategy bigger then a unexplo 100% pfr strategy (100% of the hands you play) do you Think that the bigger hands like AK AA TT etc makes so much less that rasing still might be better?

How are the players you know doing limping the hands like that vs rasing them?

 

If you play vs a BB that is to tight will you raise vs him or just keep limping?

 

yeah i get the same on all videos tho looks like :(

wouldent it be more of a call for that reason we at least know he is a reg

I find this situations when flop where x/x to be tricky to play on the turn oop and be balanced.
Mostly the ip range is going to be so weak that I feel like i want to bluff almost any turn and bet river often overbetting and that I kinda make up for that by leading with all my good hands also.
What i am saying tho is if we end up losing so much ev by doing a play that creats more balance is it might not be worth it?
My other questions is whats the definition of being explotibal here?
Lets say we lead 70% on the turn and when we check (30%) we fold 100% now can he start to check back and own us with delay cb making it so our turn bluff leads become more +ev.
what the ip player have to do then is to start bluff rasing turn bet when we check meaning he will start to put in more money in to the pot when his range is weaker then our.
If it is not we should start bluff XR him more on the flop.
Overall is it maybe best to just have a leading range on the turn and if not why wont it work and with what typ of hands / players?