fellipedepaula

Hey man! We chatted a bit and played some hands together in the past (my screename was pwalker9). Good to see we'll be team mates :) you'll love P.D.! Congrats!

thanks for your advice. makes sense. I've been playing a couple of mtts today.. perhaps my opinion might still change, but I prefer cash games for now..

will play the sunday million to have fun :D

Kalupso I do own poker snowie and I do just what you said. Sometimes I get advanced... sometimes world class.. sometimes basic...

anyway, my question is: How valid/reliable is that evaluation? (in the sense that in game I take many exploitative lines)

Absolutely! I was actually watching a video from gripsed about bad poker habits. I'm guilty of doing 90% of them.

well... got mixed feelings about your reply.

In a sense, thanks for helping. Seriously.
But also, I feel dumb now :D.

But that works!

All the best man

Hey HawksWin,
Many thanks for the great reply. I learned a lot.

All the best!

Thanks Samu, I feel idiot now that I tried that play. But I think this might be a common thing for beginners.

Thanks for commenting

Great idea!

Mish Thanks. What about river in your opinion?

Thanks for your analysis man. Makes sense to check back turn and reevaluate river. All the best!

Thanks. And I agree with your point.
all the best mate.

Hi Steve Paul , around 10:30 you fold JJ (on KT99). Would you call the PSB it if it wasn't multiway?

Thanks!

Thank you. My reason for calling was the small BTN raise and also the fact that I already had 1bb invested in the pot;

What's the lowest pocket pair I should be calling?

Hi Francesco,
I do own a solver (gtoplus) and I find myself spending quite some time on it. But I have a few views/questions regarding the practical application of this whole solver studying and hopefully you can help me.

The way I see it is that, since people are playing nowhere near the 'gto build', node locking is practically mandatory if we want to take any meaningful conclusions.

However, the problem is that we're inputting our own assumptions on how people play in real life into the solver and then analyse what would be the best counter strategy. (ie.: the pool don't bluff as much, so we remove "some" bluffs).

How relevant such analysis is considering it's founded on assumptions? Aren't these assumptions creating a 'compounding effect' so that small assumptions in the beginning can can lead to very different results? What's the point of all this then?

Thanks!

Any solver can do that (I highly recommend GTO Plus).

Now I do have a question though, besides the general ideas of equity/nut advantage, what's the practical application of being able to guess the actual equity %?

Thank you for this video Chris! I'm going to create a simple warm-up session, very basic, just to start creating the habit. But mostly important, I decided - after considering the points you make throughout the video - that I won't be starting a playing session from now on without doing this routine first.