doped1ckclub

Well said neenee. We need more great exploitative coaching like neenee on the RIO video making staff.

Did you find any general population tendencies regarding river bet timing tells?

1:45 - J8s. Since this is the bottom of our flop check/calling range, shouldn't we be looking to turn this hand into a bluff on a runout so good for our range?

What are your thoughts on building a very small sized 3bet range in this spot? (Maybe we just have AA-JJ in this range and a few bluff combos)

Roughly, what kind of a ratio of (Value : Bluffs) should we have for half pot sized turn bets?

Roughly, what kind of a ratio of (Value : Bluffs) should we have for half pot sized turn bets?

Roughly, what kind of a ratio of (Value : Bluffs) should we have for half pot sized turn bets?

Fantastic series. Doesn't our overall preflop range construction appreciate the fact that we are underfolding to 4bets? (If pool starts to under 4bet, we get to open and 3 bet wider)

One of your best videos

Specifically what are whales doing differently than regs at these stakes?

Do you think my winrate would increase as my effective stack size decreases in live games where people VPIP too wide preflop? I am considering buying in for 40 bb's instead of 200 bb's as my standard.

Do you think my winrate would increase as my effective stack size decreases in live games where people VPIP too wide preflop? I am considering buying in for 40 bb's instead of 200 bb's as my standard.

When constructing a generic flop raise strategy, ROUGHLY* what should be our ratio of bluffs to value? (x:y)
Generic meaning an average of frequent situations (stack size between 40bb-150bb, cbet being 50% ish of pot, raise size being about pot, etc)

When constructing a generic flop raise strategy, ROUGHLY* what should be our ratio of bluffs to value? (x:y)

Generic meaning an average of frequent situations (stack size between 40bb-150bb, cbet being 50% ish of pot, raise size being about pot, etc)

Why?

Here is another example of what I am talking about. You might be able to do part of a lesson video about this concept.

There are different EV's attached to each AT combo based on the sizing we make it. ATss plays best as a bet of 54 (+5.2) yet Pio suggests we use ALL sizings available at some frequency.

In PIO spots that play as a mix, sometimes PIO has us taking lines that have a negative value attached to it. Can you explain this?

Example: Pio has us raising all in on the turn with KQo at about a 50% frequency, but shows values as:
Fold: +1.7
Call: +2.3
Raise all in: -1.5

Why would we ever raise all in? Why wouldn't we play this as a call every time?

Thanks