Hi kevin I really like your videos! I am wondering (in the QT2ddc) why you didnt choose to rerun the sim with just the 1/4 sizing + large sizing though. Do we suspect he is using 3 sizings on the flop? I am assuming this might have a very dramatic impact on the 1/4 sizing turn play. OR are we trying to get the gist of it vs what hands, want to do what? And don't care about how many combos we have in that range?
In other words just the idea of what hands are favoring doing what things. But not concerned with the exact strategy output? I'm just worried that the solver is going to output stuff that is too different from usable information here with so many deviations on flop sizings and our OOP reactions leading into the turn.
Hi kevin I really like your videos! I am wondering (in the QT2ddc) why you didnt choose to rerun the sim with just the 1/4 sizing + large sizing though. Do we suspect he is using 3 sizings on the flop? I am assuming this might have a very dramatic impact on the 1/4 sizing turn play. OR are we trying to get the gist of it vs what hands, want to do what? And don't care about how many combos we have in that range?
In other words just the idea of what hands are favoring doing what things. But not concerned with the exact strategy output? I'm just worried that the solver is going to output stuff that is too different from usable information here with so many deviations on flop sizings and our OOP reactions leading into the turn.
Oct. 28, 2020 | 5:52 p.m.