dont_play_jj

Hey, is there still one slot left? I am really motivated and hard working.
Thx!

Hey, I think you've got such a monster hand on the turn that you want the pot to swell, + given the fact that you're facing a passive fish you've still got some showdown value because he has got a ton of draws here that he won't be able to bluff OTR. definitely a bet around 3/4 pot OTT Imo.

Hi, against a weaker player I guess 3barreling with a small sizing OTT and OTR might be good

Hi, imo betting the flop is way too thin versus a weaker player. I'd consider betting AJ+ for value with a sizing around 1/3; 1/2. Here I think you've got enough showdown value to x. If he's not a degen he's gonna bring a ton of hands to showdown such as Jhighs, and it allows you to thin value pretty easily on later streets.

Hi, against a fish we lean lean towards check/folding flop to think it over OTR and bluff, Or 3 barreling to make him fold his medium pocket pairs

Hi, I guess the fact that you've got the Jh adds you enough equity to call here. I guess this might be the bottom of your calling range.
However, this is still a purely "GTO" assumption. At NL10 regs will be waaay underbluffing those spots imo, that would be a good reason to find a fold imo

Hey, I'd call at least 2 streets there.

Hi, I personally use a 1/3pot sizing cbetting 100% of my range.

I gave you my point of view. It might be right or wrong, but I have the feeling this is getting nowhere. Let's wait for some more experienced players opinion

http://imgur.com/a/Ds5N4

THIS is the BEST possible case. If both villains can't read ranges. you only have 37% EQ against those guys. This is still value cutting yourself. the ranges I defined before might be a little bit too tight, considering the fact that villains are way too passive and Calling stations. BUT THIS IS IN THE BEST CASE, and it's still no good to raise.

Yes I do. If you're raising here, It is for value. The definition of value is getting paid by worse. If you're raising here, you're sometimes gettin paid by worse: some AA, KK... But most of their calling range will beat you. That's the definition of value-cutting.

Try to use equilab instead of flopzilla. It is much easier to understand and on the top of that, It is free.

Here it is. 13% considering that he's gonna call his 99s 30% of the time.
http://imgur.com/a/CYW7a

Hi,

Preflop: 56s is imo a liiiittle bit too loose, 67s is ok.

Flop: Ok, I assume check/calling would be a fine play too.

Turn: If you check here, It's only to check raise. Your hand got so much EQ against his range. Value the shit out of this guy, he still has some Two pairs, maybe set of 7, overpairs, pairs+draws...

River: As played, check raising all in is ok.

Preflop's good
Flop's good
Turn's good imo he still had diamond fd
River: EASY FOLD, regs rarely bluff this spot, he 3bets an UTG range which btw is pretty face up, one word, 4 letters: F O L D.

The lack of infos makes the decision pretty close. In this kind of spot, pref fold and most important thing: take a note!

If you raise on this flop, you're almost only representing a set. Maybe JTs. But you don't have draws that would be played like this. Otherwise, it would be a bad play considering stack to pot ratio and odds. For example, 99 is a call there.
The only hands that would call you in SB's range facing a raise are JJ-TT, maybe 99.
The only hands that would call you in BTN's range are AA-KK,JJ-TT,Q9s.
Against those range, your hand only has 6% EQ. Your range only has 19% EQ.
So yeah, raising here is not a good play! in my opinion!

Call. you've got about 35% against the two ranges you're facing OTF. The only thing you would accomplish by raising is making them fold their worst hands like QQ (If they are decent players).

(Bb seems to be a fish. His range is wider than what you expect (i'd add 88, maybe 77, all suited broadways...))
OTF, he could have a set of sevens, flush draws, 88,99, jj, sometimes qq.
So I guess I'd call at least 2 streets. I have no access to any equity calculator software rn, but we always have at least 2 calls here. Fishs always tend to value cut themselves in this kind of spot.

Hi, imo you're right about this. Villain's range is capped + the fact that you've got some blockers makes your play +EV. Even if he still has got some Kx broadways in his range that will call you down.

Don't worry about over folding or not at these stakes, even if it's always good to understand it. You can start thinking about it in NL100 imo.

+1 for lMaufjute2. Agreed.

Assuming villain is a reg, I think you played it well untill river. I think you can't check/call there, check/fold is better. Your hand blocks too much weirds floating which catched a heart flush draw turn, and he hasn't got enough bluffs in his range. And the fact that it's a 3way pot removes nearly all floatings from his range.
You need 38% equity to be EV0. You must have around 25% with this hand (MAXIMUM). The only thing is you only beat a bluff.

But if you have a note on villain that he's a complete degenerate++++, you can call.

Well my guess, he's 3-betting on your utg open, I would define his range as JJ+/ AQs+/AKo, on an 8-max table, but i'm ok to flat pre as deep, then on the flop, check call is fine I guess, because tournament players are over c-betting even if That's a good player, he won't cbet that high with JJ, then we're only ahead of AK and chpoing with AQs.
Turn when he 2nd barrel more than 50% on that blank, i think there is no bluffs except AsKs and you're not ahead of that many hand, KQs would just have flat pre, so as QJs maybe, you can't broke here TPTK on a 3bet pot, and i would just check fold turn. you lost a big pot, but you still got around 40BB which is really playable