desperhate

ok, but the fact most of the top names are using this sizing nowadays intrigues me, pio right and all the top names wrong ? I don't buy it ...

to go deeper about pio on this I put 3 different bet sizing first on cbet; 25, 45, 65 and 2 on the turn; 65, 72 and 2 on the river 72 and 92

with the above 45 has the best expectation in vast majority of scenarios. But my computer hasn't got enough power to calculate with 3 or 4 different sizing on the turn and more than 2 sizing on the river and maybe it could affect the cbet strategy.

beside piosolver what do you think are the main reasons you the top guys are using those "new sizings" or are you just copying each other because it s a new trend ...

anyway I will stop bothering you with this after this last post and sorry for my interrogation ...

also thanks for this video, really enjoyed it.

gl

I think yes I m missing something, and I guess It s a strategy where you can cbet close to 80% of the time and make the life difficult to your opponent to put you on a range. And piosolver couldn't calculate how to be unexploitable with such a strategy ... Do you have a guess about where I could be right, where I could be wrong or just explaining why you think having a high cbet freq of 28% is a good strategy.

please ...

when I check on piosolver 25 or 28% cbet strategy doesn 't seem to be the best, 41 to 46% has better results ... Am I missing something ?

wish we could see their graph ourselves

I didn t mean you have to be famous, but a prouf that your concepts or thoughts are working on the long run, otherwise it s like watching a video of my neighbour I can see new concepts, a new type of play, but when I see his results I better not do what he does

Hi, this video looks good, nice to see some HU sng ...
the problem is we don't get to see a bio from you, we don't know if what you do is proven to be good strategy etc ... we don't know your results or anything what did you accomplish in poker.
For example, ben sulski has some great results still nowadays so when we listen to him during a video we know what he is saying has some great value. I m sorry if it sounds a bit harsh but this is a great way to value the contents of the videos.

Thanks,

haven't checked it but will definitly do, thanks a lot

hi i d like to cancel my subscription and it s not possible from paypal how can I do ?

I m just 15 minutes on the video and d like to say it 's pretty good content so far

cool they have u here 

I think Gus Hansen stopped laughing ...

objective answer ...

I don't agree, 

to me time is simply time, nothing like a treasure or whatever ...

Spending ur time w/ ur friends and havin fun blablabla ... has NO more value than time competing, making money, improving ..... life is a mix of it all ... just do what u wanna do or need to do whenever u want or can 

ur post (maybe i got u wrong) feels like u need to justify enjoying life outide of poker even more

maybe u r not competitive enough for that, maybe u r not good and don't want to put the work to improve, only money oriented without passion ... socializing is what u love the most ... all those reasons are necessary tho ... otherwise we would all be the same and the world would be boring

my overall impression is Phil doing too much huge bluff vs people calling extremely light, and a sticky style OOP post flop (mainly on the turn), which seems to lose more than it earns.

wooki3z daniel cates seems to be into HUSNG lately and doing really good

imperium on full tilt, swanranson on ps , vbv, havin one of them would be insane

this is an excellent post, I ve been to ur PT4 forum post and it seems to be hard to do it, I ll keep it posted if I find my way to make such a hud

really cool u pay a little bit of attention to us (NL HU players) sometimes ty ty ty ...

your HUD looks great any chance we can buy it ?

for Christmas plz or before ....

HU ZOOOOOOOOOOOOm videos from u and sauce .....hurry up!!!!!!!!!!!!

u r the boss !!

really enjoyed listening to ur point of view and it opened my eyes further ... thanks

their preflop bet sizing don't seem to relate on hand strenght, I guess it 's just completely random.

to disguise your range preflop min raising only , or 3xing only, would do the same job, so I guess this is to create fake ranges preflop to confuse bb ...

overall, what I noticed while watching those vids, is they both bet to induce and block more than valuing

I d like to see those bots playing 25, 20bb, 10bb, 5bb