Does PIO show a similar 60% equity threshold when IP on the turn facing a smaller blocking lead bet and deciding to raise or call?
Intuitively I would guess so, for similar reasons to the OOP on river logic: where by just calling the small bet on the turn IP, we let our opponent dictate the bet size on the river.
Here's an example: we raise AcKd in cutoff, and SB call, bb folds.
Flop KhQh3d, and sb donks 1/2 pot, we call.
Turn Qc....sb donks 1/3 pot...
I would think we're over 60% equity vs range, and calling let's opp draw for cheap, decide to continue to bluff on river or not, or value bet to whatever size they want on river.
This hand was a real life example where I just called turn, having seen my opponents often donking small here very strong in the past.
Does PIO show a similar 60% equity threshold when IP on the turn facing a smaller blocking lead bet and deciding to raise or call?
Intuitively I would guess so, for similar reasons to the OOP on river logic: where by just calling the small bet on the turn IP, we let our opponent dictate the bet size on the river.
Here's an example: we raise AcKd in cutoff, and SB call, bb folds.
Flop KhQh3d, and sb donks 1/2 pot, we call.
Turn Qc....sb donks 1/3 pot...
I would think we're over 60% equity vs range, and calling let's opp draw for cheap, decide to continue to bluff on river or not, or value bet to whatever size they want on river.
This hand was a real life example where I just called turn, having seen my opponents often donking small here very strong in the past.
Feb. 11, 2017 | 4:32 a.m.