danilo1

Thx for the video

min 27:00 Ah6h, what are the considerations for not having enough bluffs for a thin value bet, on the river?

Great video as always.
I would like to review your theoretical video, like the one made on simplification. glglgl

1:13 tab3 (KQ) : why does this work well? how does the population respond? how should it respond?
1:59 tab1 (44) same questions

Thx for the nice video

imho we can't fold, KK should be our top range. I think that we can fold any fd, apart Axhh, QQ-99(we are folding around 80%). Once on the river call on the cards without hearts. I think that one possibility is to go allin on the turn.
CO[AA-QQ,50%[AhQh,AhJh,AhTh,Ah9h,KhQh,KhJh]]

On this blank turn we have top range and equity advantage, so we could bet big with polarized range or small with merged range. Imho A6 is always a bet with small size and with big size if bet or not, it depend which size we want to use .

Imho on the river the bet size of btn seems a little bit inconsistent, i think that he should bet a big size with trips/full/bluff . When he bets 0.5psb, i start thinking that he may be towards the bluff because he continues to bet big with trips+ , but i could be wrong because he could also bet in thin value bet

i think that is a good line, turn probably his range is towards value [2P/fd/set/AdKx/AdQx/AdJx] and we can't call because our equity is insufficient

I agree with BigFiszh
Imho you can see some video of database review for see how the stats should be

Imho call is a good option (fold Kx9c) and we are in the top range.
I think we have to consider that even if he has potential bluffs in the range, he does not necessarily bet them all, and the same for value combos like tp.

I changed the toy a little and what I realized is that the size of the reverse bet (scenario A) is used when oop folds much more than the balance frequency against big size and calls much more against small size, while if the deviation is closer to the gto frequency, we can bet big with the value as in scenario D.

Nice video as always and please more toygame, i love them.

I think its range is towards bluffs because after two call he shouldn't have 88/66, but sometime he can slowplay these, so we can call. Imho his range has 22/TT,T8s[50],66[20]/88[20] and can bluffs with busted fd like A7hh[20],J9hh[20],QJhh[20].

Against unknow i leave by assuming that sb has a linear range of 7% or 8%, so i prefer 4bet AA,KK,AK,QQ[50],JJ[50] and in bluff AQo[50],KTs[50] and call QQ[50],JJ[50],TT,99[50],AQs,AJs,ATs,KQs.

River in the shoes of btn i think that QQ+ and low fd don't seem a good 3bet/shove because the board has potential of full and str8, but can be different if you have info that he can do this, and when there aren't these combos a str8 or AA are a fold.
I think if btn has these combos, we could call w str8.
Preflop , did you use a polarized range?

I don't think there are 55/22/1gap suited because preflop he mostly fold them.
I would consider that on the flop he called in a 4 way and than continue with 2 barrel, imho his range is very narrow and it hasn't enough bluff for call.
I would prefer for bluffcathing AJ>AA, because it blocks QJs/JJ and don't have heart because his it block potential bluffs as busted fd/sd

Hi Patrick, often you say "if villain bets this and that we can call, or if villain bets this and this other wen can fold", how for example on the river with AA[39:00 Tab 1]. It would be nice to have an more detailed explanation of how our line changes as the villain range changes and how you choose which line should be better.

Nice video, glgl

1. i don't have a opinion
   2.I think that he bets with a polarized range and i prefer to call than raise, because river we have a combo that don't blocker his bluffs [ AT,KT,AdQX,KdQx,87s] and also these combos fold vs raise

I think that his range is [AA,AT,A8s,A6s,88,66] and we are 50% of equity, so i would call.
His stack makes me think he is an aggressive player, because in general you do not have 5 buy-in with a passive strategy, so it is possible that besides having slowplay his range can also have bluff, but it is only a reasoning that generally does not I take to decide whether to call

Imho when bet 0.9psb you're isolating yourself with the strong part of the range of btn, and T9s is too weak for value bet and i think one consequently of betting wide merged range is also that our checking range is too weak on river.
Check seem a good action .
If turn is unopened, river on blank we can bet for take value from middle/low value of his range, from hands like 99-77/7x ; or c/c for take value from some bluff like 98/QJs/KJs/44

Thanks for the reply and for the video
Beyond fold equity, do you think it's relevant to think about blocking hands like Q9 / J9 and on the river without hearts / spades runouts we won't block busted fd, to choose a combo like that? Or is fold equity the main and only reason?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=23GWQE-n3mY&list=PLChajxbxH2QG5AGcrkJEkWIocCc28nXsk&index=14

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-2PVB2-BNHw&list=PLChajxbxH2QG5AGcrkJEkWIocCc28nXsk&index=6