brumbajan

Nice video Paul. I think a Monker/Vision analysis of the closer spots as highlighted would be helpful although agree a deviation from solver solutions on at least two occasions would be merited given population tendency. Thanks.

Have been looking forward to the continuance of this series. I enjoy the PLO MTT coverage in general - I think this aspect of PLO is strategically intriguing and challenging. I am one of the few that don’t find it boring!

As always, nice video Richard - big fan of your content.

More for this please Phil - and be as authoritative as you like. It really helps to get the message home.

An absolute cracker - thank you so much. Particularly enjoyed the Vision analysis

Hi devwil

Thanks for taking the time out to respond - much appreciated.

I will have a think about your observations and revert. There is a lot there to digest!

Pretty sure you should not be defending this hand in the BB - far too disconnected. A fold irrespective of the odds you are being offered.

Video title should read PKO not PLO. Had me fooled there for a second 😊

On the contrary to the above comment, I found this video extremely useful. The content illustrates the reality of reg fillies zoom plo games in 2019 (or indeed reg fillled online plo generally) where discipline and nittting it up is the order of the day. It also illustrates the importance of game selection.

The regular games aren’t glamorous or exciting but AS does demonstrate what needs to be done to remain profitable.

“Boring” - quite possibly. Valuable - I think so.

What did SB's range look like in your opinion?

https://www.runitonce.com/plo/tom-chambers/

Tom, well it works for me!

Pure theory study is really starting to help PLO "click" for me and I for one look forward to the remainder of the series. I have watched the videos a number of times already and will continue to so. They are helping put other work on the site in context and therefore I am getting more out of those as well. Thank you! Mind you, I still have your work from Pokersavvy :).

Keep up the great work!

I confess to being a little disappointed with this video. Leo is capable of delivering good content as his previous videos have shown. Long periods of silence, mumbled and generalised comments do him no credit. I will assume this is just down to him being rusty.

Excellent videos.

A class act for an Essential pro - in PLO terms for me the best on the site (including Elite). Well prepared, clear articulation for a guy where English is not his first language and obviously very intelligent. He will go far no matter what he does showing this level of professionalism.

Nice video and I enjoyed the pace. Notwithstanding you were running very well, I like explanations - very clear. Happy for you to carry on with this type of video.

Hi Stefan

Thanks for this. Ran the numbers on PPT and actually couldn't believe how much equity we have even against a pretty tight 30% range. I always thought the dangler had a much greater impact than it actually has.

Shows what a noob I am and the benefit of actually running the simulations.

Thanks!

11:00 right table. Apart from the button, this hand appears to me to have little going for it. Did you have history with the player to call the 4b? What was your plan and how did it change when the flop came down?

Hi Stefan

I don't think you are doing your talent justice in this format of video. Quite simply there is too much going on for you to make more meaningful observations on the specific spots.

I would suggest cutting down the number of tables to two and giving yourself the opportunity to make more specific or general strategic comment if the action is slow. Indeed if you were to stop once in a while and comment on a specific spot, I am sure no one would mind. I play these levels and would appreciate more strategic comment

In addition, take a tip from Phil and simply close and open a new table if you run out of time bank.

I hope this helps.

I am sure there is a point to this post and someone will get it soon and advice. Suffice to say, graph looks fine to me (I would be pretty happy with the result shown). Try Jared Tendler's book and podcasts

For me, given that the read of villain is uber aggro and the game dynamic is as described then potting the flop with a view to getting it in feels right. On the turn you can get him to commit the rest of his stack when you are still ahead and the cards run out as they will.

I find myself guilty of this type of play too and I susoect, like me, it comes from your hold em background