antihero
205 points
Looks fine. On regular tables you'll also play a lot of hands against the same regs, so you'll develop reads quicker, just take notes :)
Aug. 28, 2017 | 8:08 p.m.
Pre is fine, esp against this sizing. Fold flop, you're pretty much at the btm of your range and may have reverse implied odds on a K or J.
Aug. 17, 2017 | 10:52 p.m.
lol calculaments
Aug. 17, 2017 | 10:14 a.m.
Ah I see, my bad. I assumed he made videos as well, cause of the avatar thing.
Still, saying in this thread that he's made great posts and contributed a lot to the forum discussion feels wrong to me, when a good portion of this posts were misleading or outright lies.
Aug. 16, 2017 | 5:17 p.m.
I wonder... Does nobody from RIO check someone's rPTR before hiring them? That should really be part of the vetting process imo. I feel that RIO could be a bit more self-critical in this case and be thankful that people outed this borderline scamming.
Aug. 16, 2017 | 2:21 p.m.
I'd certainly call on a spade or diamond river. Folding on a club seems fine imo, as I think he can barrel all his NFDs here.
Aug. 16, 2017 | 2:04 p.m.
Wow this is so scummy... especially to come here after being exposed and defend himself with fake graphs. wtf dude
Aug. 15, 2017 | 3:25 p.m.
Party seems decent for MTTs. Reg cash games suck as you need to get an "illegal" converter to use a HUD or play at a severe disadvantage against other regs. Fast forward you can use regular HUD. Rakeback is much better than on Stars now since they've introduced the chests.
Aug. 15, 2017 | 3:19 p.m.
Buy cash boni? I also read somewhere that playing "The Deal" is actually +EV if it's over a certain threshold... not sure if that's true tho and what the specifics are.
Aug. 15, 2017 | 2:57 p.m.
Depending on where you play, live low stakes NL can be ridiculously soft and most villains will make a ton of mistakes. If you want to make hundreds of thousands, you'd have to play high stakes tho, which can be very tough I assume (I never played higher than 2/5).
Aug. 15, 2017 | 2:54 p.m.
Hi Iain, nice video!
Regarding the QQ hand at 31:00, where you advocate checking back the turn. Wouldn't it be quite bad to give a free card to a hand with 10-20% equity (like 7c6c, Ac8c, AdJd, ...) that villain decided to bluff the flop with and then give up? If villain has AA/KK, we're stacking off on the river anyways as you said. Considering that villain should realize that we most likely have an overpair, I don't see him jamming many of his flop bluffs on blank rivers for less than 1/2 pot.
edit: didn't refresh page so didn't see that ULpiano had pretty much the same thoughts until after posting... :)
Aug. 15, 2017 | 2:45 p.m.
Sounds interesting, posting here to follow
Aug. 15, 2017 | 10:25 a.m.
With your hand, you're looking to get two streets of value usually, so checking the turn and then calling or betting river when checked to seems like a good line.
Aug. 13, 2017 | 12:44 p.m.
Certainly fine to call against this sizing. Assuming villain bets range, we have more than enough direct equity and we can pick up additional equity on a bunch of turns.
I would call with my whole continuing range on this texture being IP as I don't see a strong reason for raising any nutted hands.
Aug. 10, 2017 | 11:51 a.m.
Calling is fine
Aug. 4, 2017 | 1:34 p.m.
I might not be able to find a fold in game. But if you think about it, your hand is very face-up as AK/AQ and even the fun player will realize that, so I doubt he's shoving AJ/AQ type hands here. So his value range should be AK+ and usually the fun player won't have enough bluffs here (unless he's some kind of aggressive whale). If he has hearts, he's very likely x/c the turn.
Aug. 4, 2017 | 1:31 p.m.
Villain is very unlikely to fold a better hand to this raise size... also getting shoved on would suck. Just call, he gives you an opportunity to draw super cheaply.
Aug. 1, 2017 | 9:05 p.m.
Your sample size is basically meaningless but have a look here:
http://www.runitonce.com/chatter/joe-ingrams-take-on-zoom-vs-regular-cas/
Aug. 1, 2017 | 8:30 p.m.
So you range villain on no value hands at all and exactly 4 bluff combos? Would you bet/call 99 in this spot?
Aug. 1, 2017 | 8:26 p.m.
Another great video, Diego. Keep up the good work!
July 18, 2017 | 4:52 p.m.
Excellent vid, very helpful!
March 5, 2017 | 6:20 p.m.
@masticlox: Great thinking process for a new player!
I agree that you rep so little value combos by firing three here. And you have some SD value, so I don't like betting 3.
Feb. 16, 2017 | 11:18 p.m.
I call, pot odds too good. 30bb effective is shallow but if BB checks, it's still SPR 10.
Feb. 16, 2017 | 11 p.m.
I usually just treat these min-donkbets as checks by villain
Dec. 14, 2016 | 6:59 p.m.
Easy bet/call. While turn raises are usually nutty, he can easily have a overpair himself that he decides to shove with.
Nov. 17, 2016 | 3:53 p.m.
yup
Nov. 17, 2016 | 3:35 p.m.
Betting pot/pot is certainly a good line. Whether you get it in over 2 streets or 3 streets doesn't matter too much imo. We should definitely be all-in by the end of the hand though! So turn check seems like a mistake... just bet turn 1/2 pot again and shove river.
Nov. 16, 2016 | 5:29 p.m.
I think you def want to take a note that he's capable of turning showdown value into a bluff in this spot. The vast majority of the NL50 player pool probably snap-checks back Tx in that spot.
fist pump high five snap call
Sept. 17, 2017 | 12:17 p.m.